Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1550299 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-04 00:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-08 10:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] scsi/bfa: use designated initializers Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-01-04 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] scsi/bfa: use designated initializers Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-01-08 10:50 +0100
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 00:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] scsi/bfa: use designated initializers |
| Message-ID | <sVGQq-4Vk-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:05:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> Prepare to mark sensitive kernel structures for randomization by making >> sure they're using designated initializers. These were identified during >> allyesconfig builds of x86, arm, and arm64, with most initializer fixes >> extracted from grsecurity. > > Instead of further bloating the idiotic dispatch table just kill it off > entirely: Sounds fine to me! Is this going via your tree? Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-08 10:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sXigV-4z0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1550299 |
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:25:22PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Sounds fine to me! Is this going via your tree? I don't have a suitable tree, but I'll resend it to the scsi list in a separate thread ASAP.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web