Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1554896 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-10 04:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-10 12:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: build warning after merge of the rtc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-10 04:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rtc tree Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-10 12:00 +0100
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-10 04:10 +0100 |
| Subject | linux-next: build warning after merge of the rtc tree |
| Message-ID | <sXUYV-4ej-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Alexandre,
After merging the rtc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
produced this warning:
drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c: In function 'read_rtc_register_wa':
drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c:131:25: warning: 'index_max' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
return rtc->val_to_freq[index_max].value;
^
Introduced by commit
61cffa2438e3 ("rtc: armada38x: Follow the new recommendation for errata implementation")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-10 12:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sY2jL-he-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1554896 |
Hi,
On 10/01/2017 at 14:01:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote :
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> After merging the rtc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced this warning:
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c: In function 'read_rtc_register_wa':
> drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c:131:25: warning: 'index_max' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> return rtc->val_to_freq[index_max].value;
> ^
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 61cffa2438e3 ("rtc: armada38x: Follow the new recommendation for errata implementation")
This is definitively a false positive, is it worth fixing it?
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web