Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1551732 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-05 09:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-05 11:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] x86/apic: Fix two typos in comments Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-01-05 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] x86/apic: Fix two typos in comments Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2017-01-05 11:00 +0100
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/apic: Fix two typos in comments |
| Message-ID | <sWbrb-bR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
* Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > s/inr_logical_cpuidi/nr_logical_cpuids/ > s/generic_processor_info()/__generic_processor_info()/ > > Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c > index 5b7e43e..c32a3ad 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c > @@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup) > /* > * The number of allocated logical CPU IDs. Since logical CPU IDs are allocated > * contiguously, it equals to current allocated max logical CPU ID plus 1. > - * All allocated CPU ID should be in [0, nr_logical_cpuidi), so the maximum of > + * All allocated CPU ID should be in [0, nr_logical_cpuids), so the maximum of There's another typo in that sentence as well, and the wording should be clarified as well while at it. Something like this would work for me: > + * All allocated CPU IDs should be in the [0, nr_logical_cpuids) range, > + * so the maximum of Thanks, Ingo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sWd03-1dl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1551732 |
Hi, Ingo At 01/05/2017 04:15 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> s/inr_logical_cpuidi/nr_logical_cpuids/ >> s/generic_processor_info()/__generic_processor_info()/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c >> index 5b7e43e..c32a3ad 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c >> @@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup) >> /* >> * The number of allocated logical CPU IDs. Since logical CPU IDs are allocated >> * contiguously, it equals to current allocated max logical CPU ID plus 1. >> - * All allocated CPU ID should be in [0, nr_logical_cpuidi), so the maximum of >> + * All allocated CPU ID should be in [0, nr_logical_cpuids), so the maximum of > > There's another typo in that sentence as well, and the wording should be clarified > as well while at it. Something like this would work for me: > >> + * All allocated CPU IDs should be in the [0, nr_logical_cpuids) range, >> + * so the maximum of > Yes, It is. :) Thanks, Dou
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web