Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1551418 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv processors

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv  processors Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-04 22:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv processors "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-01-04 23:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv  processors Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-04 23:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv processors "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-01-04 23:50 +0100

#1551418 — Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv processors

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:38:15 +0530
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:

> > +The following POWER processors are supported in powernv mode:
> > +POWER8
> > +POWER9

I've applied this to the docs tree, thanks.

jon

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1551447 — Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv processors

On Wednesday, January 04, 2017 02:35:27 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:38:15 +0530
> Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +The following POWER processors are supported in powernv mode:
> > > +POWER8
> > > +POWER9
> 
> I've applied this to the docs tree, thanks.

OK

I'm assuming then, that you're going to handle cpufreq docs changes in the
future.

Some cpufreq patches update the docs too, though, so there may be changes in
there coming from two sources.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1551448

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 23:11:30 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> I'm assuming then, that you're going to handle cpufreq docs changes in the
> future.
> 
> Some cpufreq patches update the docs too, though, so there may be changes in
> there coming from two sources.

I saw it wasn't in linux-next yet, so figured I had to. :)

If you'd rather I stayed away from there, I'll happily do so, just say
the word (and preferably send a MAINTAINERS update :).

Thanks,

jon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1551473 — Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv processors

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 23:11:30 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm assuming then, that you're going to handle cpufreq docs changes in the
>> future.
>>
>> Some cpufreq patches update the docs too, though, so there may be changes in
>> there coming from two sources.
>
> I saw it wasn't in linux-next yet, so figured I had to. :)

Well, it actually is there in my linux-next branch and I was going to
include it in the next pull request.

Still, I can drop it easily enough. :-)

> If you'd rather I stayed away from there, I'll happily do so, just say
> the word (and preferably send a MAINTAINERS update :).

I can handle cpufreq docs updates, but if you think it's better to
route them via the docs tree, that would be fine by me too.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web