Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1551440 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

Started byJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
First post2017-01-04 23:10 +0100
Last post2017-01-04 23:10 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST  backends Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-04 23:10 +0100

#1551440 — Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

FromJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date2017-01-04 23:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends
Message-ID<sW1US-2ik-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon,  2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc
> for QEMU's documentation.  Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively
> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes.  Patches 3 to 5, instead,
> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with
> the input and output of the rST backend.
> 
> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends;
> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm
> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :)

I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll
go ahead and apply them.

Thanks,

jon

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web