Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1551440 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-04 23:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-04 23:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-04 23:10 +0100
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 23:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends |
| Message-ID | <sW1US-2ik-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc > for QEMU's documentation. Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively > straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes. Patches 3 to 5, instead, > are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with > the input and output of the rST backend. > > I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends; > but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm > trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :) I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll go ahead and apply them. Thanks, jon
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web