Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1550744 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style

Started byZiyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
First post2017-01-04 14:00 +0100
Last post2017-01-05 03:40 +0100
Articles 6 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com> - 2017-01-04 14:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 14:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-01-04 19:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style Ziyuan <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com> - 2017-01-05 08:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> - 2017-01-05 02:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2017-01-05 03:40 +0100

#1550744 — [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style

FromZiyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-01-04 14:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix some coding style
Message-ID<sVTkB-4MT-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Let's fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl:

- line over 80 characters;
- block comments should align the * on each Lines;
- statements not starting on a tabstop.

Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
---

 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index ed63237..a8efe3f 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ struct idmac_desc {
 
 	__le32		des1;	/* Buffer sizes */
 #define IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(d, s) \
-	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
+	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | \
+	 (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
 
 	__le32		des2;	/* buffer 1 physical address */
 
@@ -2733,16 +2734,16 @@ static void dw_mci_init_dma(struct dw_mci *host)
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 
 	/*
-	* Check tansfer mode from HCON[17:16]
-	* Clear the ambiguous description of dw_mmc databook:
-	* 2b'00: No DMA Interface -> Actually means using Internal DMA block
-	* 2b'01: DesignWare DMA Interface -> Synopsys DW-DMA block
-	* 2b'10: Generic DMA Interface -> non-Synopsys generic DMA block
-	* 2b'11: Non DW DMA Interface -> pio only
-	* Compared to DesignWare DMA Interface, Generic DMA Interface has a
-	* simpler request/acknowledge handshake mechanism and both of them
-	* are regarded as external dma master for dw_mmc.
-	*/
+	 * Check tansfer mode from HCON[17:16]
+	 * Clear the ambiguous description of dw_mmc databook:
+	 * 2b'00: No DMA Interface -> Actually means using Internal DMA block
+	 * 2b'01: DesignWare DMA Interface -> Synopsys DW-DMA block
+	 * 2b'10: Generic DMA Interface -> non-Synopsys generic DMA block
+	 * 2b'11: Non DW DMA Interface -> pio only
+	 * Compared to DesignWare DMA Interface, Generic DMA Interface has a
+	 * simpler request/acknowledge handshake mechanism and both of them
+	 * are regarded as external dma master for dw_mmc.
+	 */
 	host->use_dma = SDMMC_GET_TRANS_MODE(mci_readl(host, HCON));
 	if (host->use_dma == DMA_INTERFACE_IDMA) {
 		host->use_dma = TRANS_MODE_IDMAC;
@@ -2756,9 +2757,9 @@ static void dw_mci_init_dma(struct dw_mci *host)
 	/* Determine which DMA interface to use */
 	if (host->use_dma == TRANS_MODE_IDMAC) {
 		/*
-		* Check ADDR_CONFIG bit in HCON to find
-		* IDMAC address bus width
-		*/
+		 * Check ADDR_CONFIG bit in HCON to find
+		 * IDMAC address bus width
+		 */
 		addr_config = SDMMC_GET_ADDR_CONFIG(mci_readl(host, HCON));
 
 		if (addr_config == 1) {
@@ -3337,8 +3338,8 @@ int dw_mci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	 * Restore the initial value at FIFOTH register
 	 * And Invalidate the prev_blksz with zero
 	 */
-	 mci_writel(host, FIFOTH, host->fifoth_val);
-	 host->prev_blksz = 0;
+	mci_writel(host, FIFOTH, host->fifoth_val);
+	host->prev_blksz = 0;
 
 	/* Put in max timeout */
 	mci_writel(host, TMOUT, 0xFFFFFFFF);
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1550763

FromAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-04 14:20 +0100
Message-ID<sVTDY-5aP-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1550744
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> Let's fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl:
>
> - line over 80 characters;
> - block comments should align the * on each Lines;
> - statements not starting on a tabstop.

>         __le32          des1;   /* Buffer sizes */
>  #define IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(d, s) \
> -       ((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
> +       ((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | \
> +        (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))

I don't think there is a significant value to split. How many
characters it fits right now?
Up to 90 for such a code is okay for my point of view. It makes it
more readable than split variant.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1551086

FromJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date2017-01-04 19:40 +0100
Message-ID<sVYDE-8nf-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1550744
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 20:52 +0800, Ziyuan Xu wrote:
> Let's fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl:
> 
> - line over 80 characters;
> - block comments should align the * on each Lines;
> - statements not starting on a tabstop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
[]
> @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>  
>  	__le32		des1;	/* Buffer sizes */
>  #define IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(d, s) \
> -	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
> +	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | \
> +	 (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))

Please look to improve code rather than just shut up
the brainless checkpatch script.

If this is really valuable, it'd probably be better as
an inline function, or as it's only used once, just
as direct code in that one place.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1551691

FromZiyuan <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-01-05 08:40 +0100
Message-ID<sWaOt-895-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1551086

On 01/05/2017 02:32 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 20:52 +0800, Ziyuan Xu wrote:
>> Let's fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl:
>>
>> - line over 80 characters;
>> - block comments should align the * on each Lines;
>> - statements not starting on a tabstop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> []
>> @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>>   
>>   	__le32		des1;	/* Buffer sizes */
>>   #define IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(d, s) \
>> -	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
>> +	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | \
>> +	 (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
> Please look to improve code rather than just shut up
> the brainless checkpatch script.
>
> If this is really valuable, it'd probably be better as
> an inline function, or as it's only used once, just
> as direct code in that one place.

Fine, I get it. Thanks for the advice.:-)

>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1551547

FromJaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Date2017-01-05 02:30 +0100
Message-ID<sW52p-4fR-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1550744
Hi,

On 01/04/2017 09:52 PM, Ziyuan Xu wrote:
> Let's fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl:
> 
> - line over 80 characters;
> - block comments should align the * on each Lines;
> - statements not starting on a tabstop.

If there is no critical problem, 
I think that current codes are keeping better than changing.
When someone contribute the patches relevant to these, it can be also changed,
(It's more meaningful.)

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index ed63237..a8efe3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>  
>  	__le32		des1;	/* Buffer sizes */
>  #define IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(d, s) \
> -	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
> +	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | \
> +	 (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
>  
>  	__le32		des2;	/* buffer 1 physical address */
>  
> @@ -2733,16 +2734,16 @@ static void dw_mci_init_dma(struct dw_mci *host)
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>  
>  	/*
> -	* Check tansfer mode from HCON[17:16]
> -	* Clear the ambiguous description of dw_mmc databook:
> -	* 2b'00: No DMA Interface -> Actually means using Internal DMA block
> -	* 2b'01: DesignWare DMA Interface -> Synopsys DW-DMA block
> -	* 2b'10: Generic DMA Interface -> non-Synopsys generic DMA block
> -	* 2b'11: Non DW DMA Interface -> pio only
> -	* Compared to DesignWare DMA Interface, Generic DMA Interface has a
> -	* simpler request/acknowledge handshake mechanism and both of them
> -	* are regarded as external dma master for dw_mmc.
> -	*/
> +	 * Check tansfer mode from HCON[17:16]
> +	 * Clear the ambiguous description of dw_mmc databook:
> +	 * 2b'00: No DMA Interface -> Actually means using Internal DMA block
> +	 * 2b'01: DesignWare DMA Interface -> Synopsys DW-DMA block
> +	 * 2b'10: Generic DMA Interface -> non-Synopsys generic DMA block
> +	 * 2b'11: Non DW DMA Interface -> pio only
> +	 * Compared to DesignWare DMA Interface, Generic DMA Interface has a
> +	 * simpler request/acknowledge handshake mechanism and both of them
> +	 * are regarded as external dma master for dw_mmc.
> +	 */
>  	host->use_dma = SDMMC_GET_TRANS_MODE(mci_readl(host, HCON));
>  	if (host->use_dma == DMA_INTERFACE_IDMA) {
>  		host->use_dma = TRANS_MODE_IDMAC;
> @@ -2756,9 +2757,9 @@ static void dw_mci_init_dma(struct dw_mci *host)
>  	/* Determine which DMA interface to use */
>  	if (host->use_dma == TRANS_MODE_IDMAC) {
>  		/*
> -		* Check ADDR_CONFIG bit in HCON to find
> -		* IDMAC address bus width
> -		*/
> +		 * Check ADDR_CONFIG bit in HCON to find
> +		 * IDMAC address bus width
> +		 */
>  		addr_config = SDMMC_GET_ADDR_CONFIG(mci_readl(host, HCON));
>  
>  		if (addr_config == 1) {
> @@ -3337,8 +3338,8 @@ int dw_mci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	 * Restore the initial value at FIFOTH register
>  	 * And Invalidate the prev_blksz with zero
>  	 */
> -	 mci_writel(host, FIFOTH, host->fifoth_val);
> -	 host->prev_blksz = 0;
> +	mci_writel(host, FIFOTH, host->fifoth_val);
> +	host->prev_blksz = 0;
>  
>  	/* Put in max timeout */
>  	mci_writel(host, TMOUT, 0xFFFFFFFF);
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1551578

FromShawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Date2017-01-05 03:40 +0100
Message-ID<sW689-4TF-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1551547
On 2017/1/5 9:19, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/04/2017 09:52 PM, Ziyuan Xu wrote:
>> Let's fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl:
>>
>> - line over 80 characters;
>> - block comments should align the * on each Lines;
>> - statements not starting on a tabstop.
>
> If there is no critical problem,
> I think that current codes are keeping better than changing.
> When someone contribute the patches relevant to these, it can be also changed,
> (It's more meaningful.)
>

Indeed.

Moreover, it breaks the git-blame history when we need to review
how the code had been developing..


> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index ed63237..a8efe3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>>
>>  	__le32		des1;	/* Buffer sizes */
>>  #define IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(d, s) \
>> -	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
>> +	((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & cpu_to_le32(0x03ffe000)) | \
>> +	 (cpu_to_le32((s) & 0x1fff)))
>>
>>  	__le32		des2;	/* buffer 1 physical address */
>>
>> @@ -2733,16 +2734,16 @@ static void dw_mci_init_dma(struct dw_mci *host)
>>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>
>>  	/*
>> -	* Check tansfer mode from HCON[17:16]
>> -	* Clear the ambiguous description of dw_mmc databook:
>> -	* 2b'00: No DMA Interface -> Actually means using Internal DMA block
>> -	* 2b'01: DesignWare DMA Interface -> Synopsys DW-DMA block
>> -	* 2b'10: Generic DMA Interface -> non-Synopsys generic DMA block
>> -	* 2b'11: Non DW DMA Interface -> pio only
>> -	* Compared to DesignWare DMA Interface, Generic DMA Interface has a
>> -	* simpler request/acknowledge handshake mechanism and both of them
>> -	* are regarded as external dma master for dw_mmc.
>> -	*/
>> +	 * Check tansfer mode from HCON[17:16]
>> +	 * Clear the ambiguous description of dw_mmc databook:
>> +	 * 2b'00: No DMA Interface -> Actually means using Internal DMA block
>> +	 * 2b'01: DesignWare DMA Interface -> Synopsys DW-DMA block
>> +	 * 2b'10: Generic DMA Interface -> non-Synopsys generic DMA block
>> +	 * 2b'11: Non DW DMA Interface -> pio only
>> +	 * Compared to DesignWare DMA Interface, Generic DMA Interface has a
>> +	 * simpler request/acknowledge handshake mechanism and both of them
>> +	 * are regarded as external dma master for dw_mmc.
>> +	 */
>>  	host->use_dma = SDMMC_GET_TRANS_MODE(mci_readl(host, HCON));
>>  	if (host->use_dma == DMA_INTERFACE_IDMA) {
>>  		host->use_dma = TRANS_MODE_IDMAC;
>> @@ -2756,9 +2757,9 @@ static void dw_mci_init_dma(struct dw_mci *host)
>>  	/* Determine which DMA interface to use */
>>  	if (host->use_dma == TRANS_MODE_IDMAC) {
>>  		/*
>> -		* Check ADDR_CONFIG bit in HCON to find
>> -		* IDMAC address bus width
>> -		*/
>> +		 * Check ADDR_CONFIG bit in HCON to find
>> +		 * IDMAC address bus width
>> +		 */
>>  		addr_config = SDMMC_GET_ADDR_CONFIG(mci_readl(host, HCON));
>>
>>  		if (addr_config == 1) {
>> @@ -3337,8 +3338,8 @@ int dw_mci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>>  	 * Restore the initial value at FIFOTH register
>>  	 * And Invalidate the prev_blksz with zero
>>  	 */
>> -	 mci_writel(host, FIFOTH, host->fifoth_val);
>> -	 host->prev_blksz = 0;
>> +	mci_writel(host, FIFOTH, host->fifoth_val);
>> +	host->prev_blksz = 0;
>>
>>  	/* Put in max timeout */
>>  	mci_writel(host, TMOUT, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web