Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1550494 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-04 09:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-04 11:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-04 09:10 +0100
Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de> - 2017-01-04 09:20 +0100
Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-04 09:40 +0100
Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de> - 2017-01-04 11:00 +0100
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 09:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement |
| Message-ID | <sVONX-200-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri 30-12-16 18:23:58, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 30-12-16 17:52:30, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > Sorry, did reply only you.. > > > > Am Fr den 30. Dez 2016 um 12:11 schrieb Michal Hocko: > > > > If this turns out to be memory cgroup related then the patch from > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161226124839.GB20715@dhcp22.suse.cz might > > > > help. > > > > > > Did you get chance to test the above patch? I would like to send it for > > > merging and having it tested on another system would be really helpeful > > > and much appreciated. > > > > Sorry, no, I was a bit busy when coming back from X-mass. ;-) > > > > Maybe I can do so today. > > > > The only think is, how can I find out if the bug is fixed? Is 7 days > > enough? Or is there a change to force the bug to happen (or not)...? > > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours > as far as I remember. Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for inclusion and feedback from you is really useful. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement |
| Message-ID | <sVOXD-24Q-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1550494 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Michal, Am Mi den 4. Jan 2017 um 9:06 schrieb Michal Hocko: > > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do > > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your > > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours > > as far as I remember. > > Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for > inclusion and feedback from you is really useful. Yes. It runs since 2017-01-01 and without problems until today. I think it looks good but that is just my feeling. I don't know if it is to early to say that. I also did some heavy git repository actions to big repositories. The system is in swap and still no OOMs. Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.ch> Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Charset: ISO-8859-1 iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEMWF28vh4/UMJJLQEpnwKsYAZ9qwFAlhsrxoACgkQpnwKsYAZ 9qz1CQv/YLYqrABY+8HfYmRoUEPMgPbmWeSeIRiIgiBoN6XmHQ0hCBLecl6mmGoP P9RgR62mU9LEtEqvrgFbX+/MXsdVefWozf0C+b3gs5Sym4VHoHvMWm9q1sdY845R 1sbhACXFLzgYYZ+uXwMg+pwYb3ZW70N1GQcUdbEOBWdWzlWcoKVGwIj6awNfX7RH gOFP3KsXsdPKaIMHmF3+0VamGY1xfbL0kvm4nzqqfrD5YmIbGaZoRqv8lF8yz1b/ JH6SEc6X9gcknvvTCj7EZgq4nmrDW5KYE935CcS85khUdvp80aXe+y5YgBhjfjOx BYcTxejHgSfEEKEqvhlQ7Pmi49QpYcwxyLU2UTwrXFcxPKY7xm9iPO6Pn/NHSsMF YCCphIfMv0Rgy/QOATOdECXFhJWzChNEAQTYIl3UrzBT0PAfnr30E0B13dgpfISU TZPcWYjXsokiHLzqDDjN0VIcXaPfR+RCNQUcCwHUJYRCBY+upuZogLnM6lOHhZWN aUzVem/l =kiM7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 09:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement |
| Message-ID | <sVPh0-2aY-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1550502 |
On Wed 04-01-17 09:15:27, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Am Mi den 4. Jan 2017 um 9:06 schrieb Michal Hocko: > > > > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do > > > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your > > > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours > > > as far as I remember. > > > > Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for > > inclusion and feedback from you is really useful. > > Yes. It runs since 2017-01-01 and without problems until today. > > I think it looks good but that is just my feeling. I don't know if it is > to early to say that. > > I also did some heavy git repository actions to big repositories. The > system is in swap and still no OOMs. OK, that is a good indication. I will add your Reported-by to the patch and if you feel comfortable also Tested-by. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 11:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement |
| Message-ID | <sVQwp-2U6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1550515 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Michal, Am Mi den 4. Jan 2017 um 9:31 schrieb Michal Hocko: > On Wed 04-01-17 09:15:27, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > Am Mi den 4. Jan 2017 um 9:06 schrieb Michal Hocko: > > > > > > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do > > > > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your > > > > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours > > > > as far as I remember. > > > > > > Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for > > > inclusion and feedback from you is really useful. > > > > Yes. It runs since 2017-01-01 and without problems until today. > > > > I think it looks good but that is just my feeling. I don't know if it is > > to early to say that. > > > > I also did some heavy git repository actions to big repositories. The > > system is in swap and still no OOMs. > > OK, that is a good indication. I will add your Reported-by to the patch > and if you feel comfortable also Tested-by. Yes, thats great by me. Just use Klaus@Ethgen.de (without +lkml). :-) Thanks for working on that issue. I'd like to give it until end of the day. Then it is full 3 days. The longest time I had it running with broken version was once over 2 days, once once 3 days and once even 4 days (with sleeps in between). However, then, I didn't give it heavy memory load. Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.ch> Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Charset: ISO-8859-1 iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEMWF28vh4/UMJJLQEpnwKsYAZ9qwFAlhsxWEACgkQpnwKsYAZ 9qwqmgv/cuufn7mtqg9yb5T6deskFHbK2vyt7ezHKtwfHh+cDbI0P0gpBg0ThO18 WMgQ7PJonywRrGucFVRqxu214b1QAwBav0Nzkz43791exzBrM7AXtd1JX/bLYHEP Z128e3eMADvd0Tf5Wqu5g5cvf0nZ+tQsXlgx+SqcXxeO6RpUTH5EBlGLNpkhHjyV InPN8SWlwpCCDQyYh3vhEzl02PnyT4EkmKTpATvCUhI8WlglKYmsDKcEw/YM5gCA cByq9wwiXeqbKnrSZAejJnK/VtzOrTkDU7t2BsN1hK45UO94Lj+nc2wtmPEukvry IUYhK/x/wg0a8N4WfAR76Yprg4cKAfuDCtHPq2/b92UcuJA2d4KR+12Uidh9RL9C JOSPkiIhBm1YOcGFzosddSomBKPvg89yEB8LLtbnb8mM9T8UTBSF3pmyKuzc1jnh 8FXkla+HTHUB/pbUStlU4avtbPzDR3pRCKITPuATTLsc2oipj2x43UuTwtBnRlD+ 7ANZfjIj =Ns+2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web