Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1550494 > unrolled thread

Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement

Started byMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
First post2017-01-04 09:10 +0100
Last post2017-01-04 11:00 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-04 09:10 +0100
    Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de> - 2017-01-04 09:20 +0100
      Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-01-04 09:40 +0100
        Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and  memorymanagement Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de> - 2017-01-04 11:00 +0100

#1550494 — Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement

FromMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date2017-01-04 09:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement
Message-ID<sVONX-200-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri 30-12-16 18:23:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-12-16 17:52:30, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > Sorry, did reply only you..
> > 
> > Am Fr den 30. Dez 2016 um 12:11 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> > > > If this turns out to be memory cgroup related then the patch from
> > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161226124839.GB20715@dhcp22.suse.cz might
> > > > help.
> > >
> > > Did you get chance to test the above patch? I would like to send it for
> > > merging and having it tested on another system would be really helpeful
> > > and much appreciated.
> > 
> > Sorry, no, I was a bit busy when coming back from X-mass. ;-)
> > 
> > Maybe I can do so today.
> > 
> > The only think is, how can I find out if the bug is fixed? Is 7 days
> > enough? Or is there a change to force the bug to happen (or not)...?
> 
> Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do
> not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your
> previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours
> as far as I remember.

Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for
inclusion and feedback from you is really useful.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1550502 — Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement

FromKlaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de>
Date2017-01-04 09:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement
Message-ID<sVOXD-24Q-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1550494
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Michal,

Am Mi den  4. Jan 2017 um  9:06 schrieb Michal Hocko:

> > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do
> > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your
> > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours
> > as far as I remember.
> 
> Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for
> inclusion and feedback from you is really useful.

Yes. It runs since 2017-01-01 and without problems until today.

I think it looks good but that is just my feeling. I don't know if it is
to early to say that.

I also did some heavy git repository actions to big repositories. The
system is in swap and still no OOMs.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen                                       http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16            Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.ch>
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Charset: ISO-8859-1
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=kiM7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1550515 — Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement

FromMichal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date2017-01-04 09:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement
Message-ID<sVPh0-2aY-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1550502
On Wed 04-01-17 09:15:27, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> Am Mi den  4. Jan 2017 um  9:06 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> 
> > > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do
> > > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your
> > > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours
> > > as far as I remember.
> > 
> > Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for
> > inclusion and feedback from you is really useful.
> 
> Yes. It runs since 2017-01-01 and without problems until today.
> 
> I think it looks good but that is just my feeling. I don't know if it is
> to early to say that.
> 
> I also did some heavy git repository actions to big repositories. The
> system is in swap and still no OOMs.

OK, that is a good indication. I will add your Reported-by to the patch
and if you feel comfortable also Tested-by.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1550593 — Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement

FromKlaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@ethgen.de>
Date2017-01-04 11:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement
Message-ID<sVQwp-2U6-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1550515
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Michal,

Am Mi den  4. Jan 2017 um  9:31 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> On Wed 04-01-17 09:15:27, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> > 
> > Am Mi den  4. Jan 2017 um  9:06 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> > 
> > > > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do
> > > > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your
> > > > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours
> > > > as far as I remember.
> > > 
> > > Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for
> > > inclusion and feedback from you is really useful.
> > 
> > Yes. It runs since 2017-01-01 and without problems until today.
> > 
> > I think it looks good but that is just my feeling. I don't know if it is
> > to early to say that.
> > 
> > I also did some heavy git repository actions to big repositories. The
> > system is in swap and still no OOMs.
> 
> OK, that is a good indication. I will add your Reported-by to the patch
> and if you feel comfortable also Tested-by.

Yes, thats great by me. Just use Klaus@Ethgen.de (without +lkml). :-)
Thanks for working on that issue.

I'd like to give it until end of the day. Then it is full 3 days.

The longest time I had it running with broken version was once over 2
days, once once 3 days and once even 4 days (with sleeps in between).

However, then, I didn't give it heavy memory load.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen                                       http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16            Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.ch>
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Charset: ISO-8859-1
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=Ns+2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web