Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1545742 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-21 13:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-26 15:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] Multiple VF's grouped together under single physical port called PF group PF Group maintainance API's Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 13:50 +0100
RE: [RFC PATCH 5/7] Multiple VF's grouped together under single physical port called PF group PF Group maintainance API's "Koteshwar Rao, Satha" <Satha.Rao@cavium.com> - 2016-12-26 15:20 +0100
| From | Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-21 13:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] Multiple VF's grouped together under single physical port called PF group PF Group maintainance API's |
| Message-ID | <sQOvg-3vJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Satha Koteswara Rao
<satha.rao@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> +struct tns_global_st {
> + u64 magic;
> + char version[16];
> + u64 reg_cnt;
> + struct table_static_s tbl_info[TNS_MAX_TABLE];
> +};
> +
> +#define PF_COUNT 3
> +#define PF_1 0
> +#define PF_2 64
> +#define PF_3 96
> +#define PF_END 128
Some comments please ... what is 0, 64, 96 ??
You can read PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF from PCI config space instead of
defining PF_END with 128.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Koteshwar Rao, Satha" <Satha.Rao@cavium.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-26 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sSEi5-5Pl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1545742 |
Thanks for suggestion. Will clean up code in next revision
Thanks,
Satha
-----Original Message-----
From: Sunil Kovvuri [mailto:sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 4:44 AM
To: Koteshwar Rao, Satha
Cc: LKML; Goutham, Sunil; Robert Richter; David S. Miller; Daney, David; Vatsavayi, Raghu; Chickles, Derek; Romanov, Philip; Linux Netdev List; LAKML
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] Multiple VF's grouped together under single physical port called PF group PF Group maintainance API's
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Satha Koteswara Rao <satha.rao@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> +struct tns_global_st {
> + u64 magic;
> + char version[16];
> + u64 reg_cnt;
> + struct table_static_s tbl_info[TNS_MAX_TABLE]; };
> +
> +#define PF_COUNT 3
> +#define PF_1 0
> +#define PF_2 64
> +#define PF_3 96
> +#define PF_END 128
Some comments please ... what is 0, 64, 96 ??
You can read PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF from PCI config space instead of defining PF_END with 128.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web