Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1544205 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-18 21:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-18 21:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Uninitialized variable in bfad_im_bsg_els_ct_request Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> - 2016-12-18 21:50 +0100
| From | Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-18 21:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Uninitialized variable in bfad_im_bsg_els_ct_request |
| Message-ID | <sPQz7-6FT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello,
Currently on Linus master tree and in linux-next [1],
bfad_im_bsg_els_ct_request() code starts with the following code:
int
bfad_im_bsg_els_ct_request(struct bsg_job *job)
{
/*...*/
struct fc_bsg_request *bsg_request = bsg_request;
struct fc_bsg_reply *bsg_reply = job->reply;
uint32_t command_type = bsg_request->msgcode;
The local variable "bsg_request" is initialized to itself (which would
usually mean it is uninitialized) but it is dereferenced in order to get
its "msgcode" field. As I am quite new to the kernel code and
dereferencing self-initialized local variables looks black magic to me,
could you please describe why this code is valid?
It has recently been introduced by commit 01e0e15c8b3b ("scsi: don't use
fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly").
Thanks,
Nicolas Iooss
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad_bsg.c?id=06548160dfecd1983ffd9d6795242a5cda095da5#n3356
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web