Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1543363 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-16 12:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-16 21:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 04/13] vfio-pci: use 32-bit comparisons for register address for gcc-4.5 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/13] vfio-pci: use 32-bit comparisons for register address for gcc-4.5 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2016-12-16 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 04/13] vfio-pci: use 32-bit comparisons for register address for gcc-4.5 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 21:00 +0100
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 12:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 04/13] vfio-pci: use 32-bit comparisons for register address for gcc-4.5 |
| Message-ID | <sOYp4-2rU-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Using ancient compilers (gcc-4.5 or older) on ARM, we get a link
failure with the vfio-pci driver:
ERROR: "__aeabi_lcmp" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!
The reason is that the compiler tries to do a comparison of
a 64-bit range. This changes it to convert to a 32-bit number
explicitly first, as newer compilers do for themselves.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
index 5ffd1d9ad4bd..357243d76f10 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
@@ -193,7 +193,10 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_vga_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
if (!vdev->has_vga)
return -EINVAL;
- switch (pos) {
+ if (pos > 0xbfffful)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ switch ((u32)pos) {
case 0xa0000 ... 0xbffff:
count = min(count, (size_t)(0xc0000 - pos));
iomem = ioremap_nocache(0xa0000, 0xbffff - 0xa0000 + 1);
--
2.9.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 16:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/13] vfio-pci: use 32-bit comparisons for register address for gcc-4.5 |
| Message-ID | <sP2M1-5uf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1543363 |
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:56:25 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> Using ancient compilers (gcc-4.5 or older) on ARM, we get a link
> failure with the vfio-pci driver:
>
> ERROR: "__aeabi_lcmp" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!
>
> The reason is that the compiler tries to do a comparison of
> a 64-bit range. This changes it to convert to a 32-bit number
> explicitly first, as newer compilers do for themselves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> index 5ffd1d9ad4bd..357243d76f10 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,10 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_vga_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> if (!vdev->has_vga)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - switch (pos) {
> + if (pos > 0xbfffful)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch ((u32)pos) {
> case 0xa0000 ... 0xbffff:
> count = min(count, (size_t)(0xc0000 - pos));
> iomem = ioremap_nocache(0xa0000, 0xbffff - 0xa0000 + 1);
Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Would you like me to pull this one patch in through the vfio tree?
Thanks,
Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-16 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sP6PE-7WR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1543528 |
On Friday, December 16, 2016 8:30:56 AM CET Alex Williamson wrote: > > Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> > > Would you like me to pull this one patch in through the vfio tree? > Thanks, If you think the patch is appropriate, please merge it. I originally just posted this as illustration to raise the question of whether we actually want to support gcc-4.5, from the feedback so far it does seem like the answer is yes, and we will need it. Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web