Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1542037 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-14 17:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-15 10:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[RFC] block: check partition alignment Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-12-14 17:50 +0100
Re: [RFC] block: check partition alignment Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-12-14 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] block: check partition alignment Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-12-15 10:10 +0100
| From | Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 17:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [RFC] block: check partition alignment |
| Message-ID | <sOkUG-ju-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Partitions that are not aligned to the blocksize of a device may cause invalid I/O requests because the blocklayer cares only about alignment within the partition when building requests on partitions. device |--------4096--------|--------4096--------|--------4096--------| partition offset 512byte |-512-|--------4096--------|--------4096--------|--------4096--------| When reading/writing one 4k block of the partition this maps to reading/writing with an offset of 512 byte of the device leading to unaligned requests for the device which in turn may cause unexpected behavior of the device driver. For DASD devices we have to translate the block number into a cylinder, head, record format. The unaligned requests lead to wrong calculation and therefore to misdirected I/O. In a "good" case this leads to I/O errors because the underlying hardware detects the wrong addressing. In a worst case scenario this might destroy data on the device. To prevent partitions that are not aligned to the physical blocksize of a device check for the alignment in the blkpg_ioctl. Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- block/ioctl.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c index 755119c..8b83afee 100644 --- a/block/ioctl.c +++ b/block/ioctl.c @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static int blkpg_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct blkpg_ioctl_arg __user || pstart < 0 || plength < 0 || partno > 65535) return -EINVAL; } + /* check if partition is aligned to blocksize */ + if (p.start % bdev_physical_block_size(bdev) != 0) + return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); -- 2.8.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sOle2-F7-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1542037 |
> To prevent partitions that are not aligned to the physical blocksize > of a device check for the alignment in the blkpg_ioctl. We'd also need to reject this when reading partitions from disk, right? > + /* check if partition is aligned to blocksize */ > + if (p.start % bdev_physical_block_size(bdev) != 0) And this should be bdev_logical_block_size, as the logical block size is the only thing that matters for the OS - exposing the physical block size is just an optional hint to prevent users from doing stupid things (like creating unaligned partitions :))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-15 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sOAd4-3Wj-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1542058 |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:33:47AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > For a regular block device, I agree. But in Stephan case, I think that > the check really needs to be against the physical block size, with the > added condition that the bdev is a DASD device (similarly to the zone > alignment check for zoned block devices). Then they need to expose a chunk_size. physical block size is defined as not having a meaning for the kernel.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web