Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1541832 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-14 11:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-14 12:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 6/6] media/cobalt: use pci_irq_allocate_vectors Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> - 2016-12-14 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/6] media/cobalt: use pci_irq_allocate_vectors Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-12-14 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/6] media/cobalt: use pci_irq_allocate_vectors Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> - 2016-12-14 12:00 +0100
| From | Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 11:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/6] media/cobalt: use pci_irq_allocate_vectors |
| Message-ID | <sOf8B-5jU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 14/12/16 11:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Hans, > > just checked the current Linux tree and cobalt still uses the old > pci_enable_msi_range call. Did you queue this patch up for 4.10? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Completely forgot this. Is it OK to queue it for 4.11? Or is it blocking other follow-up work you want to do for 4.10? Regards, Hans
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sOfih-5nn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1541832 |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:37:17AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Completely forgot this. Is it OK to queue it for 4.11? Or is it blocking > other follow-up work you want to do for 4.10? My plan was to see if Bjorn would take the patch to do the trivial removal of pci_enable_msix_exact and pci_enable_msix_range even as a late 4.10 patch given it's so harmless, but either way there is follow work pending ASAP so getting it in for 4.10 would be very helpful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-14 12:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sOfrX-5qN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1541840 |
On 14/12/16 11:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:37:17AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> Completely forgot this. Is it OK to queue it for 4.11? Or is it blocking >> other follow-up work you want to do for 4.10? > > My plan was to see if Bjorn would take the patch to do the trivial removal > of pci_enable_msix_exact and pci_enable_msix_range even as a late 4.10 patch > given it's so harmless, but either way there is follow work pending ASAP > so getting it in for 4.10 would be very helpful. > OK, then I'll make a pull request for 4.10 tomorrow. Regards, Hans
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web