Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1543277 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation

Started byArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
First post2016-12-16 10:10 +0100
Last post2017-01-02 22:30 +0100
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 10:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-12-16 18:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-01-02 08:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2017-01-02 18:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-01-02 22:30 +0100

#1543277 — [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-12-16 10:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH] cpufreq: s3c64xx: remove incorrect __init annotation
Message-ID<sOWGC-1t7-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator is incorrectly annotated
as __init, since the caller is also not init:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x92fe1c): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init() to the function .init.text:s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator()

With modern gcc versions, the function gets inline, so we don't
see the warning, this only happens with gcc-4.6 and older.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
index 176e84cc3991..0cb9040eca49 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
-static void __init s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
+static void s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
 {
 	int count, v, i, found;
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq;
-- 
2.9.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1543590

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date2016-12-16 18:00 +0100
Message-ID<sP41r-6cL-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1543277
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator is incorrectly annotated
> as __init, since the caller is also not init:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x92fe1c): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init() to the function .init.text:s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator()
> 
> With modern gcc versions, the function gets inline, so we don't
> see the warning, this only happens with gcc-4.6 and older.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1548981

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-02 08:10 +0100
Message-ID<sV4UN-39U-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1543277
On 16-12-16, 10:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator is incorrectly annotated
> as __init, since the caller is also not init:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x92fe1c): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init() to the function .init.text:s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator()
> 
> With modern gcc versions, the function gets inline, so we don't
> see the warning, this only happens with gcc-4.6 and older.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> index 176e84cc3991..0cb9040eca49 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
> -static void __init s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
> +static void s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
>  {
>  	int count, v, i, found;
>  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq;

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1549321

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date2017-01-02 18:40 +0100
Message-ID<sVeKt-1QB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1548981
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 12:39:03PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-12-16, 10:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator is incorrectly annotated
> > as __init, since the caller is also not init:
> > 
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x92fe1c): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init() to the function .init.text:s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator()
> > 
> > With modern gcc versions, the function gets inline, so we don't
> > see the warning, this only happens with gcc-4.6 and older.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> > index 176e84cc3991..0cb9040eca49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> >  }
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > -static void __init s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
> > +static void s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
> >  {
> >  	int count, v, i, found;
> >  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq;
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Rafael,
Are you going to pick it up?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1549405

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date2017-01-02 22:30 +0100
Message-ID<sVil4-4ub-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1549321
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 12:39:03PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 16-12-16, 10:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator is incorrectly annotated
>> > as __init, since the caller is also not init:
>> >
>> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x92fe1c): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init() to the function .init.text:s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator()
>> >
>> > With modern gcc versions, the function gets inline, so we don't
>> > see the warning, this only happens with gcc-4.6 and older.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
>> > index 176e84cc3991..0cb9040eca49 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
>> > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
>> > -static void __init s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
>> > +static void s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
>> >  {
>> >     int count, v, i, found;
>> >     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq;
>>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> Rafael,
> Are you going to pick it up?

I thought I did, didn't I?

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web