Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1542928 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: power: supply: bq24735: reverse the polarity of ac-detect

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: power: supply: bq24735: reverse the  polarity of ac-detect Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2016-12-15 18:40 +0100

#1542928 — Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: power: supply: bq24735: reverse the polarity of ac-detect

On 12/15/2016 05:21 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The ACOK pin on the bq24735 is active-high, of course meaning that when
> AC is OK the pin is high. However, all Tegra dts files have incorrectly
> specified active-high even though the signal is inverted on the Tegra
> boards. This has worked since the Linux driver has also inverted the
> meaning of the GPIO. Fix this situation by simply specifying in the
> bindings what everybody else agrees on; that the ti,ac-detect-gpios is
> active on AC adapter absence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>
> Hi!
>
> This patch is the result of this discussion:
> http://marc.info/?t=148152531800002
>
> I don't like how it changes the one thing that is seems correct, but
> what to do?

I haven't followed this thread so hopefully what I say is relevant. My 
take is:

If the DT binding is correct or reasonable, keep it.

If the Tegra DTs contain incorrect content, and never worked correctly 
in this aspect, then fix them. We do need to maintain DT 
ABI/compatibility, but I believe only with stuff that actually worked 
correctly. If the DT has a bug, just fix it.

That said, if ti,ac-detect-gpios is describing a host GPIO, then it's 
entirely arbitrary which polarity it should have, i.e. the polarity is 
not something specified by the bq24735 HW. In that case, feel free to 
change either the binding to match the DT or the DT to match the 
binding. Changing the DT to match the binding might still be better 
since there could be other users you're not aware of, and they might 
have written their DT correctly, and you don't want to break them.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web