Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1539043 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-09 04:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-09 16:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCHv3 perf/core 0/7] Reuse libbpf from samples/bpf Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org> - 2016-12-09 04:00 +0100
Re: [PATCHv3 perf/core 0/7] Reuse libbpf from samples/bpf Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-12-09 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCHv3 perf/core 0/7] Reuse libbpf from samples/bpf Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2016-12-09 16:40 +0100
| From | Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 04:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCHv3 perf/core 0/7] Reuse libbpf from samples/bpf |
| Message-ID | <sMjq2-5Sr-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
(Was "libbpf: Synchronize implementations")
Update tools/lib/bpf to provide the remaining bpf wrapper pieces needed by the
samples/bpf/ code, then get rid of all of the duplicate BPF libraries in
samples/bpf/libbpf.[ch].
---
v3: Add ack for first patch.
Split out second patch from v2 into separate changes for remaining diff.
Add patches to switch samples/bpf over to using tools/lib/.
v2: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html
Don't shift non-bpf code into libbpf.
Drop the patch to synchronize ELF definitions with tc.
v1: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html
First post.
Joe Stringer (7):
tools lib bpf: Sync {tools,}/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
tools lib bpf: use __u32 from linux/types.h
tools lib bpf: Add flags to bpf_create_map()
samples/bpf: Make samples more libbpf-centric
samples/bpf: Switch over to libbpf
samples/bpf: Remove perf_event_open() declaration
samples/bpf: Move open_raw_sock to separate header
samples/bpf/Makefile | 61 +++++----
samples/bpf/README.rst | 4 +-
samples/bpf/bpf_load.c | 20 ++-
samples/bpf/fds_example.c | 10 +-
samples/bpf/lathist_user.c | 3 +-
samples/bpf/libbpf.c | 155 ----------------------
samples/bpf/libbpf.h | 25 +---
samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c | 1 +
samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c | 10 +-
samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c | 8 +-
samples/bpf/sock_example.c | 11 +-
samples/bpf/sock_example.h | 35 +++++
samples/bpf/sockex1_user.c | 9 +-
samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c | 7 +-
samples/bpf/sockex3_user.c | 7 +-
samples/bpf/spintest_user.c | 10 +-
samples/bpf/tc_l2_redirect_user.c | 4 +-
samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_array_pin.c | 4 +-
samples/bpf/test_current_task_under_cgroup_user.c | 10 +-
samples/bpf/test_maps.c | 142 ++++++++++----------
samples/bpf/test_overhead_user.c | 2 +
samples/bpf/test_probe_write_user_user.c | 4 +-
samples/bpf/test_verifier.c | 8 +-
samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c | 24 ++--
samples/bpf/trace_output_user.c | 6 +-
samples/bpf/tracex1_user.c | 2 +
samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c | 12 +-
samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c | 6 +-
samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c | 6 +-
samples/bpf/tracex5_user.c | 2 +
samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c | 7 +-
samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c | 4 +-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 51 +++++++
tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 2 +
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 7 +-
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 6 +-
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 +-
37 files changed, 332 insertions(+), 356 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 samples/bpf/libbpf.c
create mode 100644 samples/bpf/sock_example.h
--
2.10.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMuY9-4Pn-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1539043 |
Em Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:46:13PM -0800, Joe Stringer escreveu: > (Was "libbpf: Synchronize implementations") > > Update tools/lib/bpf to provide the remaining bpf wrapper pieces needed by the > samples/bpf/ code, then get rid of all of the duplicate BPF libraries in > samples/bpf/libbpf.[ch]. > > --- > v3: Add ack for first patch. > Split out second patch from v2 into separate changes for remaining diff. > Add patches to switch samples/bpf over to using tools/lib/. > v2: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html > Don't shift non-bpf code into libbpf. > Drop the patch to synchronize ELF definitions with tc. > v1: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html > First post. Thanks, applied after addressing the -I$(objtree) issue raised by Wang, - Arnaldo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMvrc-4YR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1539431 |
Hi Arnaldo, On 12/09/2016 04:09 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:46:13PM -0800, Joe Stringer escreveu: >> (Was "libbpf: Synchronize implementations") >> >> Update tools/lib/bpf to provide the remaining bpf wrapper pieces needed by the >> samples/bpf/ code, then get rid of all of the duplicate BPF libraries in >> samples/bpf/libbpf.[ch]. >> >> --- >> v3: Add ack for first patch. >> Split out second patch from v2 into separate changes for remaining diff. >> Add patches to switch samples/bpf over to using tools/lib/. >> v2: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html >> Don't shift non-bpf code into libbpf. >> Drop the patch to synchronize ELF definitions with tc. >> v1: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html >> First post. > > Thanks, applied after addressing the -I$(objtree) issue raised by Wang, [ Sorry for late reply. ] First of all, glad to see us getting rid of the duplicate lib eventually! :) Please note that this might result in hopefully just a minor merge issue with net-next. Looks like patch 4/7 touches test_maps.c and test_verifier.c, which moved to a new bpf selftest suite [1] this net-next cycle. Seems it's just log buffer and some renames there, which can be discarded for both files sitting in selftests. Thanks, Daniel [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web