Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1539220 > unrolled thread
| Started by | EunTaik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-09 10:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-09 23:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH] sched/pid fix use-after free in task_tgid_vnr EunTaik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com> - 2016-12-09 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] sched/pid fix use-after free in task_tgid_vnr Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-12-09 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] sched/pid fix use-after free in task_tgid_vnr ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-12-09 23:30 +0100
| From | EunTaik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 10:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] sched/pid fix use-after free in task_tgid_vnr |
| Message-ID | <sMpOO-1yx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
There is a use-after-free case with below call stack.
pid_nr_ns+0x10/0x38
cgroup_pidlist_start+0x144/0x400
cgroup_seqfile_start+0x1c/0x24
kernfs_seq_start+0x54/0x90
seq_read+0x15c/0x3a8
kernfs_fop_read+0x38/0x160
__vfs_read+0x28/0xc8
vfs_read+0x84/0xfc
A task in the cg_list was dying and the group_leader's
task struct was already freed.
To avoid this task_tgid_vnr needs to take the
rcu_read_lock and check for pid_alive.
Signed-off-by: Eun Taik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e9c009d..ed567bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2118,14 +2118,21 @@ static inline pid_t task_tgid_nr(struct task_struct *tsk)
}
pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
+static inline int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p);
static inline pid_t task_tgid_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- return pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk));
+ pid_t pid = 0;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (pid_alive(tsk))
+ pid = pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return pid;
}
-static inline int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p);
static inline pid_t task_ppid_nr_ns(const struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
pid_t pid = 0;
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMx9E-64e-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1539220 |
On 12/09, EunTaik Lee wrote:
>
> There is a use-after-free case with below call stack.
>
> pid_nr_ns+0x10/0x38
> cgroup_pidlist_start+0x144/0x400
> cgroup_seqfile_start+0x1c/0x24
> kernfs_seq_start+0x54/0x90
> seq_read+0x15c/0x3a8
> kernfs_fop_read+0x38/0x160
> __vfs_read+0x28/0xc8
> vfs_read+0x84/0xfc
This reminds about perf_event_pid() which is equally buggy...
> static inline pid_t task_tgid_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - return pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk));
> + pid_t pid = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + if (pid_alive(tsk))
> + pid = pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk));
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return pid;
> }
Eric, EunTaik, what do you think about the patch below?
I can't decide whether it is too ugly or not, but it would be nice
to avoid the code duplication.
Oleg.
--- x/include/linux/pid.h
+++ x/include/linux/pid.h
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ enum pid_type
PIDTYPE_PID,
PIDTYPE_PGID,
PIDTYPE_SID,
- PIDTYPE_MAX
+ PIDTYPE_MAX,
+ PIDTYPE_TGID /* do not use */
};
/*
--- x/kernel/pid.c
+++ x/kernel/pid.c
@@ -526,8 +526,11 @@ pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struc
if (!ns)
ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
if (likely(pid_alive(task))) {
- if (type != PIDTYPE_PID)
+ if (type != PIDTYPE_PID) {
+ if (type == PIDTYPE_TGID)
+ type = PIDTYPE_PID;
task = task->group_leader;
+ }
nr = pid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(task->pids[type].pid), ns);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -538,7 +541,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__task_pid_nr_ns);
pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
- return pid_nr_ns(task_tgid(tsk), ns);
+ return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_TGID, ns);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_tgid_nr_ns);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMBPY-sG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1539569 |
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:
> On 12/09, EunTaik Lee wrote:
>>
>> There is a use-after-free case with below call stack.
>>
>> pid_nr_ns+0x10/0x38
>> cgroup_pidlist_start+0x144/0x400
>> cgroup_seqfile_start+0x1c/0x24
>> kernfs_seq_start+0x54/0x90
>> seq_read+0x15c/0x3a8
>> kernfs_fop_read+0x38/0x160
>> __vfs_read+0x28/0xc8
>> vfs_read+0x84/0xfc
How is this a use after free. The function pid_nr_ns should take a NULL pointer
as input and return 0?
Certainly if the addtion of pid_alive fixes it pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk))
is fine. Are we perhaps missing rcu locking?
Or is the problem simply that in task_tgid we are accessing
task->group_leader which may already be dead? If so the fix needs to be
in task_tgid.
> This reminds about perf_event_pid() which is equally buggy...
>
>> static inline pid_t task_tgid_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
>> {
>> - return pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk));
>> + pid_t pid = 0;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + if (pid_alive(tsk))
>> + pid = pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk));
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> + return pid;
>> }
>
> Eric, EunTaik, what do you think about the patch below?
>
> I can't decide whether it is too ugly or not, but it would be nice
> to avoid the code duplication.
I think it can be beaten into shape but I am not certain it addresses the
core issue.
>
> Oleg.
>
>
> --- x/include/linux/pid.h
> +++ x/include/linux/pid.h
> @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ enum pid_type
> PIDTYPE_PID,
> PIDTYPE_PGID,
> PIDTYPE_SID,
> - PIDTYPE_MAX
> + PIDTYPE_MAX,
> + PIDTYPE_TGID /* do not use */
I would do:
/* __PIDTYPE_TGID is only valid to __task_pid_nr_ns */
#define __PIDTYPE_TGID PIDTYPE_MAX
Prefixing __PIDTYPE_TGID with __ should help make it clear
this is a special use define.
I am also curious why pid_alive is the proper check to see if
task->group_leader is valid? That feels like it could get us into
trouble later.
Especially as that is the real problem child here.
> };
>
> /*
> --- x/kernel/pid.c
> +++ x/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -526,8 +526,11 @@ pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struc
> if (!ns)
> ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
> if (likely(pid_alive(task))) {
> - if (type != PIDTYPE_PID)
> + if (type != PIDTYPE_PID) {
> + if (type == PIDTYPE_TGID)
> + type = PIDTYPE_PID;
> task = task->group_leader;
> + }
> nr = pid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(task->pids[type].pid), ns);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -538,7 +541,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__task_pid_nr_ns);
>
> pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> {
> - return pid_nr_ns(task_tgid(tsk), ns);
> + return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_TGID, ns);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_tgid_nr_ns);
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web