Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1538986 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-09 01:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-09 01:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ZRAM struct disk usage Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 01:40 +0100
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 01:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ZRAM struct disk usage |
| Message-ID | <sMhod-4BC-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On (12/08/16 11:17), Cory Pruce wrote: > Just wondering if it was really necessary to use the disk struct. It seems > like the struct is more used for record keeping/io config than actually > holding the data (actual data is worked with via page operations). > > Is this correct? What was the main need to use the data structure? I see > that the one and only partition is used for io acct but this seems more > nice to have to me than truly necessary being that this isn't an actual > peripheral. because we want to have an actual block device with disk capacity, device IO request queue and so no. -ss
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web