Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1537308 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-07 00:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-07 16:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-12-07 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-07 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-12-07 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-12-07 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-07 16:40 +0100
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT |
| Message-ID | <sLwSm-8cn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
A customer hit a crash where the napi sd->poll_list became corrupted.
The customer had the bnx2x driver, which does a
__napi_schedule_irqoff() in its interrupt handler. Unfortunately, when
running with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, this interrupt handler is run as a
thread and is preemptable. The call to ____napi_schedule() must be done
with interrupts disabled to protect the per cpu softnet_data's
poll_list, which is protected by disabling interrupts (disabling
preemption is enough when all interrupts are threaded and
local_bh_disable() can't preempt).
As bnx2x isn't the only driver that does this, the safest thing to do
is to make __napi_schedule_irqoff() call __napi_schedule() instead when
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled, which will call local_irq_save()
before calling ____napi_schedule().
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 12 ++++++++++++
net/core/dev.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
Index: linux-rt.git/include/linux/netdevice.h
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.git.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h 2016-11-18 14:59:01.679547362 -0500
+++ linux-rt.git/include/linux/netdevice.h 2016-12-06 17:35:38.506672042 -0500
@@ -395,7 +395,19 @@ typedef enum rx_handler_result rx_handle
typedef rx_handler_result_t rx_handler_func_t(struct sk_buff **pskb);
void __napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *n);
+
+/*
+ * When PREEMPT_RT_FULL is defined, all device interrupt handlers
+ * run as threads, and they can also be preempted (without PREEMPT_RT
+ * interrupt threads can not be preempted). Which means that calling
+ * __napi_schedule_irqoff() from an interrupt handler can be preempted
+ * and can corrupt the napi->poll_list.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+#define __napi_schedule_irqoff(n) __napi_schedule(n)
+#else
void __napi_schedule_irqoff(struct napi_struct *n);
+#endif
static inline bool napi_disable_pending(struct napi_struct *n)
{
Index: linux-rt.git/net/core/dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.git.orig/net/core/dev.c 2016-11-18 14:59:02.876527251 -0500
+++ linux-rt.git/net/core/dev.c 2016-12-06 17:35:38.513672035 -0500
@@ -4910,6 +4910,7 @@ void __napi_schedule(struct napi_struct
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_schedule);
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
/**
* __napi_schedule_irqoff - schedule for receive
* @n: entry to schedule
@@ -4921,6 +4922,7 @@ void __napi_schedule_irqoff(struct napi_
____napi_schedule(this_cpu_ptr(&softnet_data), n);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_schedule_irqoff);
+#endif
void __napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
{
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 10:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT |
| Message-ID | <sLGRI-6H9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1537308 |
On 2016-12-06 17:50:30 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > A customer hit a crash where the napi sd->poll_list became corrupted. > The customer had the bnx2x driver, which does a > __napi_schedule_irqoff() in its interrupt handler. Unfortunately, when > running with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, this interrupt handler is run as a > thread and is preemptable. The call to ____napi_schedule() must be done > with interrupts disabled to protect the per cpu softnet_data's > poll_list, which is protected by disabling interrupts (disabling > preemption is enough when all interrupts are threaded and > local_bh_disable() can't preempt). > > As bnx2x isn't the only driver that does this, the safest thing to do > is to make __napi_schedule_irqoff() call __napi_schedule() instead when > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled, which will call local_irq_save() > before calling ____napi_schedule(). It would work RT wise. But don't have the same problem if you boot the kernel with threadirqs ? Sebastian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 14:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT |
| Message-ID | <sLK8V-vo-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1537628 |
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:10:40 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On 2016-12-06 17:50:30 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > A customer hit a crash where the napi sd->poll_list became corrupted.
> > The customer had the bnx2x driver, which does a
> > __napi_schedule_irqoff() in its interrupt handler. Unfortunately, when
> > running with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, this interrupt handler is run as a
> > thread and is preemptable. The call to ____napi_schedule() must be done
> > with interrupts disabled to protect the per cpu softnet_data's
> > poll_list, which is protected by disabling interrupts (disabling
> > preemption is enough when all interrupts are threaded and
> > local_bh_disable() can't preempt).
> >
> > As bnx2x isn't the only driver that does this, the safest thing to do
> > is to make __napi_schedule_irqoff() call __napi_schedule() instead when
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled, which will call local_irq_save()
> > before calling ____napi_schedule().
>
> It would work RT wise. But don't have the same problem if you boot the
> kernel with threadirqs ?
>
I thought the same at first, but looking into the code for forced
threaded interrupts, I saw this:
local_bh_disable();
ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action);
local_bh_enable();
Where without CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, local_bh_disable() also disables
preemption. Then all the handlers still can not be preempted by another
handler. So it appears to be safe as well.
-- Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 16:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT |
| Message-ID | <sLMkq-1Oz-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1537732 |
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 07:53:26 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:10:40 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > On 2016-12-06 17:50:30 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > A customer hit a crash where the napi sd->poll_list became corrupted. > > > The customer had the bnx2x driver, which does a > > > __napi_schedule_irqoff() in its interrupt handler. Unfortunately, when > > > running with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, this interrupt handler is run as a > > > thread and is preemptable. The call to ____napi_schedule() must be done > > > with interrupts disabled to protect the per cpu softnet_data's > > > poll_list, which is protected by disabling interrupts (disabling > > > preemption is enough when all interrupts are threaded and > > > local_bh_disable() can't preempt). > > > > > > As bnx2x isn't the only driver that does this, the safest thing to do > > > is to make __napi_schedule_irqoff() call __napi_schedule() instead when > > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled, which will call local_irq_save() > > > before calling ____napi_schedule(). > > > > It would work RT wise. But don't have the same problem if you boot the > > kernel with threadirqs ? > > > > I thought the same at first, but looking into the code for forced > threaded interrupts, I saw this: > > local_bh_disable(); > ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id); > irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action); > local_bh_enable(); > > Where without CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, local_bh_disable() also disables > preemption. Then all the handlers still can not be preempted by another > handler. So it appears to be safe as well. > Actually, I was hoping that the change log explained this. Should I reword it better? "poll_list, which is protected by disabling interrupts (disabling preemption is enough when all interrupts are threaded and local_bh_disable() can't preempt)." -- Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 16:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RT] net: Have __napi_schedule_irqoff() disable interrupts on RT |
| Message-ID | <sLMu5-1RI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1537839 |
On 2016-12-07 10:28:34 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > Actually, I was hoping that the change log explained this. Should I > reword it better? > > "poll_list, which is protected by disabling interrupts (disabling > preemption is enough when all interrupts are threaded and > local_bh_disable() can't preempt)." That is fine, I merge it and add this piece. Thank you Steven. > -- Steve Sebastian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web