Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1535955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-05 11:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-06 09:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> - 2016-12-05 11:10 +0100
Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> - 2016-12-05 11:10 +0100
Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> - 2016-12-05 11:30 +0100
Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> - 2016-12-06 09:40 +0100
| From | "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 11:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite |
| Message-ID | <sKYnE-3bM-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, Steve On 2016/11/18 5:45, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 15:22 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Below is the results of glibc testsuite run for aarch64/lp64 > > I have been running the glibc testsuite as well. I have only run it on > an ILP32 enabled kernel. Using that kernel, top-of-tree glibc, and the > ILP32 glibc patches I have no LP64 regressions. There are 5 failures > in LP64 mode but I get them with vanilla top-of-tree glibc sources too. > They are: > nptl/eintr1 (I actually don't run this because it kills the 'make check') > debug/tst-backtrace5 > debug/tst-backtrace6 > nptl/tst-stack4 > nptl/tst-thread_local1 > > In ILP32 mode I get 33 failures, they include the above failures (minus > nptl/tst-thread_local1) plus: > > c++-types-check > conform/ISO11/inttypes.h/conform > conform/ISO11/stdint.h/conform > conform/ISO99/inttypes.h/conform > conform/ISO99/stdint.h/conform > conform/POSIX2008/inttypes.h/conform > conform/POSIX2008/stdint.h/conform > conform/XOPEN2K/inttypes.h/conform > conform/XOPEN2K/stdint.h/conform > conform/XOPEN2K8/inttypes.h/conform > conform/XOPEN2K8/stdint.h/conform > elf/tst-tls1 > elf/tst-tls1-static > elf/tst-tls2 > elf/tst-tls2-static > elf/tst-tls3 > math/check-abi-libm > math/test-double > math/test-double-finite > math/test-float > math/test-float-finite > misc/tst-sync_file_range > nptl/tst-cancel26 > nptl/tst-cancel27 > nptl/tst-sem3 > rt/tst-mqueue1 > rt/tst-mqueue2 > rt/tst-mqueue4 > rt/tst-mqueue7 > stdlib/tst-makecontext3 > > I am currently looking at these ILP32 regressions (starting with the > tls failures) to see if I can figure out what is happening with them. Is there some progresses on it? We could collabrate to fix those issues. Regards Bamvor > > Steve Ellcey > sellcey@caviumnetworks.com >
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sKYnE-3bM-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1535955 |
On Dez 05 2016, "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> wrote: > Is there some progresses on it? We could collabrate to fix those issues. All the elf/nptl/rt fails should be fixed by the recent binutils fixes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 11:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sKYGZ-3jJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1535956 |
On 2016/12/5 18:07, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 05 2016, "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> wrote: > >> Is there some progresses on it? We could collabrate to fix those issues. > > All the elf/nptl/rt fails should be fixed by the recent binutils fixes. Cool. How about the conform and other failures? Regards Bamvor > > Andreas. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sLjs5-87p-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1535956 |
On Dez 05 2016, Steve Ellcey <sellcey@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel26 > FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel27 > FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue1 > FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue2 > FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue4 > FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue7 I don't see these failures. Maybe you need to rebuild libgcc? https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/devel:ARM:AArch64:ILP32/glibc-testsuite/standard/aarch64_ilp32 Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web