Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1530298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-25 15:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-06 15:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-11-25 15:50 +0100
[PATCH v4 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 02:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-12-06 15:50 +0100
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-25 15:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments |
| Message-ID | <sHpZ8-1P4-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Em Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:56:36AM +0100, Alexis Berlemont escreveu:
> During a "perf buildid-cache --add" command, the section
> ".note.stapsdt" of the "added" binary is scanned in order to list the
> available SDT markers available in a binary. The parts containing the
> probes arguments were left unscanned.
>
> The whole section is now parsed; the probe arguments are extracted for
> later use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> index 99400b0..0fbe0b2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> @@ -1822,7 +1822,7 @@ void kcore_extract__delete(struct kcore_extract *kce)
> static int populate_sdt_note(Elf **elf, const char *data, size_t len,
> struct list_head *sdt_notes)
> {
> - const char *provider, *name;
> + const char *provider, *name, *args;
> struct sdt_note *tmp = NULL;
> GElf_Ehdr ehdr;
> GElf_Addr base_off = 0;
> @@ -1881,6 +1881,20 @@ static int populate_sdt_note(Elf **elf, const char *data, size_t len,
> goto out_free_prov;
> }
>
> + args = (const char *)memchr(name, '\0', data + len - name);
Humm, no need for casting?
> +
> + /*
> + * There is no argument if:
> + * - We reached the end of the note;
> + * - There is not enough room to hold a potential string;
> + * - The argument string is empty or just contains ':'.
> + */
> + if (args == NULL || data + len - args < 2 ||
> + args[1] == ':' || args[1] == '\0')
> + tmp->args = NULL;
> + else
> + tmp->args = strdup(++args);
Shouldn't we check this and do error back propagation? I.e. if there are
args and we don't handle them, silently, that looks bad
> +
> if (gelf_getclass(*elf) == ELFCLASS32) {
> memcpy(&tmp->addr, &buf, 3 * sizeof(Elf32_Addr));
> tmp->bit32 = true;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> index 2d0a905..913be07 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ int arch__choose_best_symbol(struct symbol *syma, struct symbol *symb);
> struct sdt_note {
> char *name; /* name of the note*/
> char *provider; /* provider name */
> + char *args;
> bool bit32; /* whether the location is 32 bits? */
> union { /* location, base and semaphore addrs */
> Elf64_Addr a64[3];
> --
> 2.10.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 02:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v4 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string |
| Message-ID | <sHzF7-8am-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1530298 |
Hi Arnaldo, Here is another patch set which fixes the issues you noticed. Thank you. Alexis. Alexis Berlemont (2): perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 18 ++++ tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 4 + tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 13 +++ tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 25 +++++- tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.10.2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 00:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string |
| Message-ID | <sLbbb-2Fq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1530580 |
Alexis Berlemont wrote: > Hi Arnaldo, > > Here is another patch set which fixes the issues you noticed. > Could you indicate me a way to improve these patches so as to move forward ? Regards, Alexis. > Thank you. > > Alexis. > > Alexis Berlemont (2): > perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments > perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string > > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 18 ++++ > tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 4 + > tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 13 +++ > tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 25 +++++- > tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 1 + > 6 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.10.2 >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-06 15:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string |
| Message-ID | <sLpea-3jz-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1536530 |
Em Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:42:45AM +0100, Alexis Berlemont escreveu: > Alexis Berlemont wrote: > > Hi Arnaldo, > > > > Here is another patch set which fixes the issues you noticed. > > > > Could you indicate me a way to improve these patches so as to move > forward ? Masami, Hemant, are you guys ok with this? Can I have your Acked-by or Tested-by, etc? - Arnaldo > Regards, > > Alexis. > > > Thank you. > > > > Alexis. > > > > Alexis Berlemont (2): > > perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments > > perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 18 ++++ > > tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 4 + > > tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 13 +++ > > tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 25 +++++- > > tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 1 + > > 6 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.10.2 > >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web