Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1538099 > unrolled thread

RE: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by default

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  RE: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by  default <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2016-12-07 22:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by default "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-12-08 00:00 +0100
      RE: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by  default <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2016-12-08 00:20 +0100

#1538099 — RE: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by default

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:05 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; Linux PM <linux-
> pm@vger.kernel.org>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>;
> Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by
> default
> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM,  <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:19 PM
> >> To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
> >> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Len Brown
> >> <len.brown@intel.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> >> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Limonciello, Mario
> >> <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by
> >> default
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This series is a follow-up for a BoF discussion during the LPC.
> >>
> >> The discussion was about supporting Linux on modern laptops and one of
> >> the issues mentioned was the lack of support for suspend-to-idle in user
> >> space and if there's anything that can be done about that in the kernel.
> >>
> >> The following patches are my input. :-)
> >>
> >> The first one reworks the suspend interface to allow the "mem" string
> >> in /sys/power/state to represent multiple things that can be selected via
> >> an additional sysfs attribute.
> >>
> >> The second one makes ACPI select suspend-to-idle as the default
> suspend
> >> mode
> >> if so indicated in the FADT.
> >>
> >> Please let me know what you think.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rafael
> >
> > Thanks for submitting.  I like the approach, especially that it leaves room
> > to easily modify the behavior for debugging purposes and adding quirks.
> 
> Well, that's the point. :-)
> 
> > I tested your series on a machine that had this bit set in the FADT and
> > confirmed that it set up and used policy properly.
> >
> > Tested-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
> 
> Thanks!

Rafael,

I hadn't noticed these merged into any of your linux-pm.git branches.

Do you have a plan for merging them?  Or waiting for other feedback?

Thanks,

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1538149 — Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by default

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:38 PM,  <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>> Rafael J. Wysocki
>> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:05 PM
>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; Linux PM <linux-
>> pm@vger.kernel.org>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>;
>> Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by
>> default
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM,  <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Rafael,
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:19 PM
>> >> To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
>> >> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Len Brown
>> >> <len.brown@intel.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
>> >> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Limonciello, Mario
>> >> <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by
>> >> default
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This series is a follow-up for a BoF discussion during the LPC.
>> >>
>> >> The discussion was about supporting Linux on modern laptops and one of
>> >> the issues mentioned was the lack of support for suspend-to-idle in user
>> >> space and if there's anything that can be done about that in the kernel.
>> >>
>> >> The following patches are my input. :-)
>> >>
>> >> The first one reworks the suspend interface to allow the "mem" string
>> >> in /sys/power/state to represent multiple things that can be selected via
>> >> an additional sysfs attribute.
>> >>
>> >> The second one makes ACPI select suspend-to-idle as the default
>> suspend
>> >> mode
>> >> if so indicated in the FADT.
>> >>
>> >> Please let me know what you think.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Rafael
>> >
>> > Thanks for submitting.  I like the approach, especially that it leaves room
>> > to easily modify the behavior for debugging purposes and adding quirks.
>>
>> Well, that's the point. :-)
>>
>> > I tested your series on a machine that had this bit set in the FADT and
>> > confirmed that it set up and used policy properly.
>> >
>> > Tested-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Rafael,
>
> I hadn't noticed these merged into any of your linux-pm.git branches.
>
> Do you have a plan for merging them?  Or waiting for other feedback?

They are in the linux-next branch (and therefore in linux-next), so on
their way to 4.10-rc1.

I usually only update topic branches at kernel.org when they are ready
to go into the mainline and the ones I have locally are merged into
the linux-next one beforehand.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1538171

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 4:57 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>; ACPI Devel
> Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Len Brown
> <len.brown@intel.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by
> default
> 
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:38 PM,  <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:05 PM
> >> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; Linux PM <linux-
> >> pm@vger.kernel.org>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-
> acpi@vger.kernel.org>;
> >> Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> >> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by
> >> default
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM,  <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Rafael,
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net]
> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:19 PM
> >> >> To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
> >> >> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Len Brown
> >> >> <len.brown@intel.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> >> >> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Limonciello, Mario
> >> >> <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by
> >> >> default
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> This series is a follow-up for a BoF discussion during the LPC.
> >> >>
> >> >> The discussion was about supporting Linux on modern laptops and one
> of
> >> >> the issues mentioned was the lack of support for suspend-to-idle in
> user
> >> >> space and if there's anything that can be done about that in the kernel.
> >> >>
> >> >> The following patches are my input. :-)
> >> >>
> >> >> The first one reworks the suspend interface to allow the "mem" string
> >> >> in /sys/power/state to represent multiple things that can be selected
> via
> >> >> an additional sysfs attribute.
> >> >>
> >> >> The second one makes ACPI select suspend-to-idle as the default
> >> suspend
> >> >> mode
> >> >> if so indicated in the FADT.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please let me know what you think.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Rafael
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for submitting.  I like the approach, especially that it leaves room
> >> > to easily modify the behavior for debugging purposes and adding quirks.
> >>
> >> Well, that's the point. :-)
> >>
> >> > I tested your series on a machine that had this bit set in the FADT and
> >> > confirmed that it set up and used policy properly.
> >> >
> >> > Tested-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > Rafael,
> >
> > I hadn't noticed these merged into any of your linux-pm.git branches.
> >
> > Do you have a plan for merging them?  Or waiting for other feedback?
> 
> They are in the linux-next branch (and therefore in linux-next), so on
> their way to 4.10-rc1.
> 
> I usually only update topic branches at kernel.org when they are ready
> to go into the mainline and the ones I have locally are merged into
> the linux-next one beforehand.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael

Ah thanks, I see 'em now.  Sorry for the noise.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web