Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1534145 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] arm: kprobe: replace patch_lock to raw lock

Started bySebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
First post2016-12-01 15:20 +0100
Last post2016-12-05 19:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] arm: kprobe: replace patch_lock to raw lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-01 15:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] arm: kprobe: replace patch_lock to raw lock "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-12-05 19:20 +0100

#1534145 — Re: [PATCH] arm: kprobe: replace patch_lock to raw lock

FromSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date2016-12-01 15:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm: kprobe: replace patch_lock to raw lock
Message-ID<sJAno-4Xx-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 2016-11-10 16:17:55 [-0800], Yang Shi wrote:
> 
> Since patch_text_stop_machine() is called in stop_machine() which disables IRQ,
> sleepable lock should be not used in this atomic context, so replace patch_lock
> to raw lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>

This can also go upstream.
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Sebastian

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1536293

From"Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Date2016-12-05 19:20 +0100
Message-ID<sL61P-80t-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1534145
On 12/1/2016 6:13 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-11-10 16:17:55 [-0800], Yang Shi wrote:
>>
>> Since patch_text_stop_machine() is called in stop_machine() which disables IRQ,
>> sleepable lock should be not used in this atomic context, so replace patch_lock
>> to raw lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
>
> This can also go upstream.
> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Yes, thanks for acking.

Russell,

Could you please consider this patch?

Thanks,
Yang

>
> Sebastian
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web