Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1535729 > unrolled thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-12-05 00:10 +0100
Last post2016-12-07 15:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-12-05 00:10 +0100
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-12-06 22:40 +0100
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-12-07 15:30 +0100

#1535729 — linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-12-05 00:10 +0100
Subjectlinux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree
Message-ID<sKO4V-504-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Linus,

After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: In function 'pl061_irq_set_wake':
drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:280:28: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named 'irq_parent'
  return irq_set_irq_wake(gc->irq_parent, state);
                            ^
drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:281:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
 }
 ^

Caused by commit

  d245b3f9bd36 ("gpio: simplify adding threaded interrupts")

I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20161202 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1537283

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-12-06 22:40 +0100
Message-ID<sLvCW-7rL-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1535729
Hi Linus,

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:00:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: In function 'pl061_irq_set_wake':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:280:28: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named 'irq_parent'
>   return irq_set_irq_wake(gc->irq_parent, state);
>                             ^
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:281:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
>  }
>  ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   d245b3f9bd36 ("gpio: simplify adding threaded interrupts")
> 
> I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20161202 for today.

I am still getting this.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1537774

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2016-12-07 15:30 +0100
Message-ID<sLLol-1fC-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1537283
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:00:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c: In function 'pl061_irq_set_wake':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:280:28: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named 'irq_parent'
>>   return irq_set_irq_wake(gc->irq_parent, state);
>>                             ^
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c:281:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
>>  }
>>  ^
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>>   d245b3f9bd36 ("gpio: simplify adding threaded interrupts")
>>
>> I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20161202 for today.
>
> I am still getting this.

Sorry. My intention was of course to put the required pl061 patches on
an immutable branch and pull into pinctrl as well.

Oh well.

FIxing it up now, sorry for the mess.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web