Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533241 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Siddhesh Poyarekar <sid@reserved-bit.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-30 12:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-30 12:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 9/9] arm64: Documentation - Expose CPU feature registers Siddhesh Poyarekar <sid@reserved-bit.com> - 2016-11-30 12:50 +0100
| From | Siddhesh Poyarekar <sid@reserved-bit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 12:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 9/9] arm64: Documentation - Expose CPU feature registers |
| Message-ID | <sJboZ-5v2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thursday 24 November 2016 07:10 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > + d) CPU Identification : > + MIDR_EL1 is exposed to help identify the processor. On a > + heterogeneous system, this could be racy (just like getcpu()). The > + process could be migrated to another CPU by the time it uses the > + register value, unless the CPU affinity is set. Hence, there is no > + guarantee that the value reflects the processor that it is > + currently executing on. The REVIDR is not exposed due to this > + constraint, as REVIDR makes sense only in conjunction with the > + MIDR. Alternately, MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 are exposed via sysfs > + at: > + > + /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$ID/regs/identification/ > + \- midr > + \- revidr > + This doesn't seem to be implemented in this patchset. Siddhesh
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web