Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1531674 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-28 22:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-29 23:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-28 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-29 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-29 23:10 +0100
| From | Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 22:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations |
| Message-ID | <sIBvb-7oU-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > Andrew, > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more > depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? > Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look. Hi Andrew, Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago? Thanks. Ying & Tim
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 23:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sIYBr-5xv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1531674 |
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. > > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__ > > depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? > > Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look. > > > Hi Andrew, > > Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, > as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago? Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree. So I have them buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sIYL7-5QB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1532810 |
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far. > > > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__ > > > depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10? > > > Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series, > > as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago? > Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree. So I have them > buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe. > Thanks. That will be great if the patchset can go into 4.10-rc1. Tim
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web