Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1528106 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/3] TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x pinconf

Started byDavid Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
First post2016-11-23 04:40 +0100
Last post2016-11-23 12:20 +0100
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/3] TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x pinconf David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> - 2016-11-23 04:40 +0100
    [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> - 2016-11-23 04:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> - 2016-11-23 12:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> - 2016-11-23 17:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-11-23 23:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> - 2016-11-24 07:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x pinconf Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> - 2016-11-23 12:20 +0100

#1528106 — [PATCH 0/3] TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x pinconf

FromDavid Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Date2016-11-23 04:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH 0/3] TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x pinconf
Message-ID<sGwzD-7Rr-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
This series adds a new driver and DT bindings for TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x
pinconf (bias pullup/pulldown).

The motivation for this series is LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 support. It needs most,
if not all, internal pullup/down resistors disabled in order to work correctly.

David Lechner (3):
  devicetree: bindings: pinctrl: Add binding for ti,da850-pupd
  pinctrl: New driver for TI DA8XX/OMAP-L138/AM18XX pinconf
  ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ti,da850-pupd.txt  |  55 ++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi                       |   5 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |   9 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da850-pupd.c               | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 280 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ti,da850-pupd.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da850-pupd.c

-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1528108 — [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

FromDavid Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Date2016-11-23 04:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf
Message-ID<sGwzE-7Rr-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1528106
This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
bias on groups of pins.

Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
@@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
 			};
 
 		};
+		pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c {
+			compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
+			reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
 		prictrl: priority-controller@14110 {
 			compatible = "ti,da850-mstpri";
 			reg = <0x14110 0x0c>;
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1528322 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

FromSekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Date2016-11-23 12:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf
Message-ID<sGDKO-494-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1528108
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
> bias on groups of pins.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
>  			};
>  
>  		};
> +		pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c {
> +			compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
> +			reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};

Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.

Thanks,
Sekhar

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1528555 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

FromDavid Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Date2016-11-23 17:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf
Message-ID<sGIAN-7bC-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1528322
On 11/23/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
>> bias on groups of pins.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
>>  			};
>>
>>  		};
>> +		pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c {
>> +			compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
>> +			reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
>> +			status = "disabled";
>> +		};
>
> Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
> nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
> but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.

I can do this, but it seems that the predominant sorting pattern here is 
to keep subsystems together (e.g. all i2c are together, all uart are 
together, etc.)

Would a separate patch to sort everything by unit address to get this 
cleaned up be acceptable?

>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1528814 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

FromKevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Date2016-11-23 23:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf
Message-ID<sGOmS-2pg-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1528555
David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> writes:

> On 11/23/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
>>> bias on groups of pins.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
>>>  			};
>>>
>>>  		};
>>> +		pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c {
>>> +			compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
>>> +			reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
>>> +			status = "disabled";
>>> +		};
>>
>> Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
>> nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
>> but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.
>
> I can do this, but it seems that the predominant sorting pattern here
> is to keep subsystems together (e.g. all i2c are together, all uart
> are together, etc.)
>
> Would a separate patch to sort everything by unit address to get this
> cleaned up be acceptable?

No thanks. That kind of thing is the needless churn that gets us flamed.

Kevin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1529006 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

FromSekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Date2016-11-24 07:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf
Message-ID<sGVeF-6OY-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1528555
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 09:54 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
>>> bias on groups of pins.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
>>>              };
>>>
>>>          };
>>> +        pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c {
>>> +            compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
>>> +            reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
>>> +            status = "disabled";
>>> +        };
>>
>> Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
>> nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
>> but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.
> 
> I can do this, but it seems that the predominant sorting pattern here is
> to keep subsystems together (e.g. all i2c are together, all uart are
> together, etc.)

Yeah, but that quickly gives away as there are many singleton devices
and everyone tries to add theirs at the end of the list resulting in
merge conflicts.

> Would a separate patch to sort everything by unit address to get this
> cleaned up be acceptable?

Agree with Kevin that it would be churn. If done, it should be last
thing that gets done in a merge window. I would not attempt it in
relatively busy merge windows like this one.

Thanks,
Sekhar

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1528321

FromSekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Date2016-11-23 12:20 +0100
Message-ID<sGDKO-494-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1528106
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> This series adds a new driver and DT bindings for TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x
> pinconf (bias pullup/pulldown).
> 
> The motivation for this series is LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 support. It needs most,
> if not all, internal pullup/down resistors disabled in order to work correctly.

This looks really neat to my non-pinconf trained eyes. I have sent some
minor comments. But apart from that:

Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>

3/3 should go through my tree. If the driver patches are going to get
queued for v4.10, I can queue the DTS portion through my tree.

Thanks,
Sekhar

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web