Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1526424 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-21 08:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-21 08:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/sun4i: Add support for the overscan profiles Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-11-21 08:40 +0100
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-21 08:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/sun4i: Add support for the overscan profiles |
| Message-ID | <sFRmO-6Ce-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:17:55AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:56:30PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:59:27AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:29:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > Create overscan profiles reducing the displayed zone. > > > > > > > > For each TV standard (PAL and NTSC so far), we create 4 more reduced modes > > > > by steps of 5% that the user will be able to select. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > > > > > > tbh I think if we agree to do this (and that still seems an open question) > > > I think there should be a generic helper to add these overscan modes with > > > increased porches. Anything that only depends upon the sink (and > > > overscanning is something the sink does) should imo be put into a suitable > > > helper library for everyone to share. > > > > > > Or maybe even stash it into the probe helpers and call it for all TV > > > connectors. Definitely not a driver-private thing. > > > > Last time we discussed it, my recollection was that you didn't want to > > have generic code for it, but I'd be happy to implement it. > > > > I'll come up with something like that. > > Well I can flip-flop around with the nonsense I'm sometimes emitting ;-) > Since you called me out, feel free to do whatever you want ... I also found the generic solution to be a much better solution, so I'll definitely implement it :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web