Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1523110 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-15 23:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-17 00:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH] docs/completion.txt: drop dangling reference to completions-design.txt Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-11-15 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] docs/completion.txt: drop dangling reference to completions-design.txt Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-11-17 00:30 +0100
| From | Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 23:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] docs/completion.txt: drop dangling reference to completions-design.txt |
| Message-ID | <sDUIa-2A0-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Per the original author, the proposed document was never deemed necessary, and the important bits got merged into completion.txt. Let's just stop confusing readers by pointing at a nonexistent doc. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> --- On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:11:26AM +0000, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > > References in the introduced completion.txt doc have pointed lost souls > > at an elusive completion-design.txt: > > > > "for details on completion design and implementation see > > completions-design.txt" [...] > If I remember correctly it was Jonathan Corbet that suggested to merge the > two and atleast the usage part got merged in the current completion.txt > The path descriptions were not included as it was not clear how long such > a path documentation would actually hold - so that was deliberately dropped > The design goals/rational was more or less lost or not seen as relevant here > as were the references/history and RT notes. As far as I remember it was a > deliberate decision to drop these parts as they were not seen to be necessary. > > Those missing bits could be merged into the current completion.txt I do not > think it makes much sense to have it in a seperate file. I'm not super interested in the missing bits -- just in de-obfuscating the doc. How about this? Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt index 2622bc7a188b..656cf803c006 100644 --- a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt @@ -25,8 +25,7 @@ struct completion that tells the waiting threads of execution if they can continue safely. As completions are scheduling related, the code is found in -kernel/sched/completion.c - for details on completion design and -implementation see completions-design.txt +kernel/sched/completion.c. Usage: -- 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 00:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sEhOp-10r-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1523110 |
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:42:14 -0800 Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote: > Per the original author, the proposed document was never deemed > necessary, and the important bits got merged into completion.txt. Let's > just stop confusing readers by pointing at a nonexistent doc. Makes sense, applied. Thanks, jon
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web