Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1523761 > unrolled thread

Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h.

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on  arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h. Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-11-16 20:20 +0100
    Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h. Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 21:20 +0100

#1523761 — Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h.

On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Corcodel Marian wrote:
>  Inline declarations suppress warning message from compiler but
>  most of these functions was declared static and is not used local on file.

Huch? This is a header file and the functions are marked inline on purpose.

Can you please explain what you are trying to achieve and why you think
that this is a good idea?

Thanks,

	tglx

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1523803 — Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h.

On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 20:16 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Corcodel Marian wrote:
> >  Inline declarations suppress warning message from compiler but
> >  most of these functions was declared static and is not used local on file.
> 
> Huch? This is a header file and the functions are marked inline on purpose.
> 
> Can you please explain what you are trying to achieve and why you think
> that this is a good idea?

Corcodel Marian is a bot.
Do not bother Thomas. 
Total Waste of time.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg370788.html

https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg103775.html

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web