Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1521911 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add pd_edp node for rk3399

Started byDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
First post2016-11-14 18:30 +0100
Last post2016-11-14 18:30 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add pd_edp node for rk3399 Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-11-14 18:30 +0100

#1521911 — Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add pd_edp node for rk3399

FromDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date2016-11-14 18:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add pd_edp node for rk3399
Message-ID<sDteW-1wp-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
Caesar,

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> From: zhangqing <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
>
> 1. add pd node for RK3399 Soc
> 2. create power domain tree
> 3. add qos node for domain

No step #3 since there doesn't appear to be a qos node for eDP.  Your
patch doesn't add one and I can't find one in the TRM.

> 4. add the pd support for edp
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> index 74deb44..09ebf4e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -835,6 +835,10 @@
>                         };
>
>                         /* These power domains are grouped by VD_LOGIC */
> +                       pd_edp@RK3399_PD_EDP {
> +                               reg = <RK3399_PD_EDP>;
> +                               clocks = <&cru PCLK_EDP_CTRL>;

Are you sure that PCLK_EDP isn't needed as well?  After the super
hard-to-debug problems we just faced with the missing GMAC clock in
the power domains, I figure it's at least worth a check.  ;)

> +                       };
>                         pd_emmc@RK3399_PD_EMMC {
>                                 reg = <RK3399_PD_EMMC>;
>                                 clocks = <&cru ACLK_EMMC>;
> @@ -1364,6 +1368,7 @@
>                 status = "disabled";
>                 pinctrl-names = "default";
>                 pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hpd>;
> +               power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_EDP>;
>
>                 ports {
>                         #address-cells = <1>;

Other than the question about the clock and the nits about the commit
message, this all looks fine to me.  Feel free to add my Reviewed-by
if you fix those things.


-Doug

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web