Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1520225 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-12 12:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-14 15:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-12 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-14 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-14 15:30 +0100
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-12 12:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery |
| Message-ID | <sCEcp-VK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:22:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Once all your locking rework is assembled it might be good to have a > > topic branch I could pull in. Both for testing and to handle conflicts > > before it goes boom in the merge window ;-) Not necessary ofc, but I > > think it'd be useful. > > Everything except the trylock_recursive is already in tip/locking/core. > > Ingo, is that all there is in that branch? It has other bits as well - but I can create a separate topic branch for this, which would be c7faee2109f9 plus trylock_recursive(). Could you send a final version of trylock_recursive() patch for me to apply? Thanks, Ingo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-14 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sDq7o-81N-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1520225 |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:58:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Could you send a final version of trylock_recursive() patch for me to apply? The latest lives here: lkml.kernel.org/r/20161109103813.GN3157@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net But I would really like someone to actually test that before you stick it in.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-14 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sDqqJ-892-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1521678 |
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:58:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Could you send a final version of trylock_recursive() patch for me to apply? > > The latest lives here: > > lkml.kernel.org/r/20161109103813.GN3157@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net > > But I would really like someone to actually test that before you stick > it in. Agreed ... Thanks, Ingo
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web