Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1522522 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-11-15 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-11-15 14:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-11-15 15:10 +0100

#1522522 — Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support

Hi Rafael,

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> > This patch series is v7 of a previous posting:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/506
> 
> I don't see anything objectionable in this series.
> 
> Please let me know which patches in particular to look at in detail.

Are patches 7 and consequently 16 (that builds on top of 7) ok with
you ? They should be equivalent to nop on anything other than ARM64
but they touch ACPI core so they require an ACK if they are ok please.

Thank you very much !
Lorenzo

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1522662

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
>> > This patch series is v7 of a previous posting:
>> >
>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/506
>>
>> I don't see anything objectionable in this series.
>>
>> Please let me know which patches in particular to look at in detail.
>
> Are patches 7 and consequently 16 (that builds on top of 7) ok with
> you ? They should be equivalent to nop on anything other than ARM64
> but they touch ACPI core so they require an ACK if they are ok please.

Yes, they are.  Please feel free to add my ACKs to those or I will
send them separately later today.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1522755

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:04:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> Hi Lorenzo,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> >> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> >> > This patch series is v7 of a previous posting:
> >> >
> >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/506
> >>
> >> I don't see anything objectionable in this series.
> >>
> >> Please let me know which patches in particular to look at in detail.
> >
> > Are patches 7 and consequently 16 (that builds on top of 7) ok with
> > you ? They should be equivalent to nop on anything other than ARM64
> > but they touch ACPI core so they require an ACK if they are ok please.
> 
> Yes, they are.  Please feel free to add my ACKs to those or I will
> send them separately later today.

Thank you very much, I will add them to v8 that should be final,
I will send it when the dust has settled on patch 4, which looks
like the last bit to sort out (we may not even need a v8 at all).

Thanks !
Lorenzo

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web