Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1518642 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-10 03:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-16 15:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 11 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> - 2016-11-10 03:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-10 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> - 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> - 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> - 2016-11-10 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-11 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-11 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> - 2016-11-16 04:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2016-11-16 15:40 +0100
| From | Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 03:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition |
| Message-ID | <sBMOJ-7gR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Fixes the following link error:
```
/usr/bin/ld: net/built-in.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.text'
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
```
This is the same definition used on some other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>
---
I am not sure this is the correct patch in the context of uml. I believe this
should give the runtime ip, which may be different between runs. It may be
better to use the offset in .text (e.g. by using `pc-__text_start`), which
should be consistent.
arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h b/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h
index c3be852..6ca3304 100644
--- a/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void arch_copy_thread(struct arch_thread *from,
}
#define current_text_addr() \
- ({ void *pc; __asm__("movq $1f,%0\n1:":"=g" (pc)); pc; })
+ ({ __label__ _l; _l: &&_l; })
#define current_sp() ({ void *sp; __asm__("movq %%rsp, %0" : "=r" (sp) : ); sp; })
#define current_bp() ({ unsigned long bp; __asm__("movq %%rbp, %0" : "=r" (bp) : ); bp; })
--
2.9.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sBSAN-2Uu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1518642 |
Keno, On 10.11.2016 02:53, Keno Fischer wrote: > Fixes the following link error: > ``` > /usr/bin/ld: net/built-in.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.text' > can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > ``` > > This is the same definition used on some other architectures. > > Signed-off-by: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> > --- > I am not sure this is the correct patch in the context of uml. I believe this > should give the runtime ip, which may be different between runs. It may be > better to use the offset in .text (e.g. by using `pc-__text_start`), which > should be consistent. The problem is ready being solved in a generic way: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147828481602561&w=2 Can you please give this patch a try? Thanks, //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition |
| Message-ID | <sC3Zf-2IW-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1518730 |
> The problem is ready being solved in a generic way: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147828481602561&w=2 > > Can you please give this patch a try? No dice. After backing out my patch and applying that one I get: /usr/bin/ld: error: net/built-in.o: requires unsupported dynamic reloc 11; recompile with -fPIC
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sC3Zf-2IW-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1519336 |
Keno, On 10.11.2016 21:10, Keno Fischer wrote: >> The problem is ready being solved in a generic way: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147828481602561&w=2 >> >> Can you please give this patch a try? > > No dice. After backing out my patch and applying that one I get: > > /usr/bin/ld: error: net/built-in.o: requires unsupported dynamic reloc > 11; recompile with -fPIC But you applied the whole series, right? Thanks, //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition |
| Message-ID | <sC3Zf-2IW-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1519338 |
Yes On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote: > Keno, > > On 10.11.2016 21:10, Keno Fischer wrote: >>> The problem is ready being solved in a generic way: >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147828481602561&w=2 >>> >>> Can you please give this patch a try? >> >> No dice. After backing out my patch and applying that one I get: >> >> /usr/bin/ld: error: net/built-in.o: requires unsupported dynamic reloc >> 11; recompile with -fPIC > > But you applied the whole series, right? > > Thanks, > //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sC3Zf-2IW-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1519339 |
Keno, On 10.11.2016 21:14, Keno Fischer wrote: > Yes Can you please reply to Sebastian's patch series and explain him how you trigger that error? I don't have a gcc broken by Debian on my machine right now. > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote: >> Keno, >> >> On 10.11.2016 21:10, Keno Fischer wrote: >>>> The problem is ready being solved in a generic way: >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147828481602561&w=2 >>>> >>>> Can you please give this patch a try? >>> >>> No dice. After backing out my patch and applying that one I get: >>> >>> /usr/bin/ld: error: net/built-in.o: requires unsupported dynamic reloc >>> 11; recompile with -fPIC >> >> But you applied the whole series, right? Thanks, //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-10 21:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition |
| Message-ID | <sC4sh-2Vb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1519340 |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote: > Can you please reply to Sebastian's patch series and explain him how you trigger > that error? > I don't have a gcc broken by Debian on my machine right now. I'm not sure how to reply to his patch series directly since I'm not subscribed to lkml (I imagine I can set headers manually, such that things get appropriately threaded, but for now let me just reply here). I don't think there's much to it. It seems like any use of `current_text_addr()` in `ARCH=um` build will cause this problem, there's just not very many such uses in the code base. I believe this particular problem should be reproducible as long as CONFIG_INET is set for an `ARCH=um` build.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-11 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sChpw-392-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1518642 |
Keno,
On 10.11.2016 02:53, Keno Fischer wrote:
> Fixes the following link error:
> ```
> /usr/bin/ld: net/built-in.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.text'
> can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> ```
How and where do you trigger this?
I had a chat with Sebastian and we are not 100% sure what is going on.
On my freshly installed Debian sid with gcc version 6.2.0 20161109 (Debian 6.2.0-13)
UML builds fine except when I set CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y
But then I'm facing a slightly different error:
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
/usr/bin/ld: init/built-in.o: relocation R_X86_64_PLTOFF64 against STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol `memmove' isn't supported
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Your patch also does not cure this. I'll investigate later into that.
> This is the same definition used on some other architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>
> ---
> I am not sure this is the correct patch in the context of uml. I believe this
> should give the runtime ip, which may be different between runs. It may be
> better to use the offset in .text (e.g. by using `pc-__text_start`), which
> should be consistent.
>
> arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h b/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h
> index c3be852..6ca3304 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/um/asm/processor_64.h
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void arch_copy_thread(struct arch_thread *from,
> }
>
> #define current_text_addr() \
> - ({ void *pc; __asm__("movq $1f,%0\n1:":"=g" (pc)); pc; })
> + ({ __label__ _l; _l: &&_l; })
>
> #define current_sp() ({ void *sp; __asm__("movq %%rsp, %0" : "=r" (sp) : ); sp; })
> #define current_bp() ({ unsigned long bp; __asm__("movq %%rbp, %0" : "=r" (bp) : ); bp; })
Thanks,
//richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-11 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sCsbf-1Q9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1519678 |
On 11.11.2016 22:03, Keno Fischer wrote: > Did you have CONFIG_INET set? I'm attaching my full .config. This is > on vanilla Ubuntu 16.10. Yes, CONFIG_INET is set. Let my try on Ubuntu. ;-\ > I did see the same error when building with `CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y`. > Note that I also, separately, ran into a linker problem, though I > believe it is unrelated to this patch > (though perhaps is related to the problem you're seeing?): > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800. This seems to be an UML<->glibc issue. memmove() is now an ifunc and for whatever reason it does not work with UML. > I'd also be happy to provide you with ssh access to the machine that > I'm seeing this on if that > would be helpful. Okay, let me try myself first. I think I'm able to install Ubuntu. :) Thanks, //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 04:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] um: Fix compile failure due to current_text_address() definition |
| Message-ID | <sDZot-5zy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1520056 |
Just as an FYI, the linker bug has been fixed in binutils. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote: > On 11.11.2016 22:03, Keno Fischer wrote: >> Did you have CONFIG_INET set? I'm attaching my full .config. This is >> on vanilla Ubuntu 16.10. > > Yes, CONFIG_INET is set. Let my try on Ubuntu. ;-\ > >> I did see the same error when building with `CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y`. >> Note that I also, separately, ran into a linker problem, though I >> believe it is unrelated to this patch >> (though perhaps is related to the problem you're seeing?): >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800. > > This seems to be an UML<->glibc issue. > memmove() is now an ifunc and for whatever reason it does not work with UML. > >> I'd also be happy to provide you with ssh access to the machine that >> I'm seeing this on if that >> would be helpful. > > Okay, let me try myself first. I think I'm able to install Ubuntu. :) > > Thanks, > //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sE9xw-48I-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1523216 |
Keno, On 16.11.2016 04:45, Keno Fischer wrote: > Just as an FYI, the linker bug has been fixed in binutils. Interesting. Is the same bug also the root cause why a static build of UML does not work? Thanks, //richard
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web