Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1517467 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi-ng: Fix CPUX clock for the A23/A33

Started byMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
First post2016-11-08 19:50 +0100
Last post2016-11-08 19:50 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi-ng: Fix CPUX clock for the A23/A33 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-11-08 19:50 +0100

#1517467 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi-ng: Fix CPUX clock for the A23/A33

FromMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date2016-11-08 19:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi-ng: Fix CPUX clock for the A23/A33
Message-ID<sBjD3-4ES-29@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:36:03PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > And your commit log should explain why it is an issue. Yours is even 
> > wrong here, we could definitely change the rate of these clocks 
> > already. The only thing that was not allowed was to change the rate of 
> > its parents, which is what this patch fixes. 
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> 
> > > --- 
> > > Patch 4.9-rc too. 
> >
> > I don't see why it should be part of 4.9. No one uses that code in 4.9. 
> 
> It can be triggered by a modified dt in 4.9, by add operating points.

Still, there's no reason to fix something that is not used by anyone,
it can definitely wait until the next release. Linus also said that he
didn't want patches like that last week.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web