Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1516478 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v3 1/2] USB hub_probe: rework ugly goto-into-compound-statement

Started byEugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
First post2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
Last post2016-11-08 08:00 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v3 1/2] USB hub_probe: rework ugly  goto-into-compound-statement Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] USB hub_probe: rework ugly  goto-into-compound-statement Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-11-08 08:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] USB hub_probe: rework ugly  goto-into-compound-statement Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-11-08 08:00 +0100

#1516478 — [PATCH v3 1/2] USB hub_probe: rework ugly goto-into-compound-statement

FromEugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-07 20:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH v3 1/2] USB hub_probe: rework ugly goto-into-compound-statement
Message-ID<sAXjc-74X-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is
legacy. Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel.

Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index cbb1467..7a20980 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -1722,10 +1722,23 @@ static void hub_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
 	kref_put(&hub->kref, hub_release);
 }
 
+static int hub_check_descriptor_sanity(struct usb_host_interface *desc)
+{
+	/* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
+	/*  specs is not defined, but it works */
+	if (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1 &&
+	    desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 2)
+		return 0;
+	/* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
+	if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
+		return 0;
+	/* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
+	return usb_endpoint_is_int_in(&desc->endpoint[0].desc);
+}
+
 static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct usb_host_interface *desc;
-	struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *endpoint;
 	struct usb_device *hdev;
 	struct usb_hub *hub;
 
@@ -1800,25 +1813,11 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	/* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
-	/*  specs is not defined, but it works */
-	if ((desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 0) &&
-	    (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1)) {
-descriptor_error:
+	if (!hub_check_descriptor_sanity(desc)) {
 		dev_err(&intf->dev, "bad descriptor, ignoring hub\n");
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
-	/* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
-	if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
-		goto descriptor_error;
-
-	endpoint = &desc->endpoint[0].desc;
-
-	/* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
-	if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(endpoint))
-		goto descriptor_error;
-
 	/* We found a hub */
 	dev_info(&intf->dev, "USB hub found\n");
 
@@ -1845,7 +1844,7 @@ static int hub_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 	if (id->driver_info & HUB_QUIRK_CHECK_PORT_AUTOSUSPEND)
 		hub->quirk_check_port_auto_suspend = 1;
 
-	if (hub_configure(hub, endpoint) >= 0)
+	if (hub_configure(hub, &desc->endpoint[0].desc) >= 0)
 		return 0;
 
 	hub_disconnect(intf);
-- 
2.10.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1516876

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-11-08 08:00 +0100
Message-ID<sB8xX-5U7-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1516478
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:53:50PM +0300, Eugene Korenevsky wrote:
> Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is
> legacy. Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

You forgot to list what changed from v2 here :(

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1516877

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-11-08 08:00 +0100
Message-ID<sB8xX-5U7-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1516478
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:53:50PM +0300, Eugene Korenevsky wrote:
> Rework smelling code (goto inside compound statement). Perhaps this is
> legacy. Anyway such code is not appropriate for Linux kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index cbb1467..7a20980 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -1722,10 +1722,23 @@ static void hub_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
>  	kref_put(&hub->kref, hub_release);
>  }
>  
> +static int hub_check_descriptor_sanity(struct usb_host_interface *desc)
> +{
> +	/* Some hubs have a subclass of 1, which AFAICT according to the */
> +	/*  specs is not defined, but it works */
> +	if (desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 1 &&
> +	    desc->desc.bInterfaceSubClass != 2)
> +		return 0;
> +	/* Multiple endpoints? What kind of mutant ninja-hub is this? */
> +	if (desc->desc.bNumEndpoints != 1)
> +		return 0;
> +	/* If it's not an interrupt in endpoint, we'd better punt! */
> +	return usb_endpoint_is_int_in(&desc->endpoint[0].desc);

Minor nit, put blank lines after each if statement to make it readable.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web