Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1469781 > unrolled thread

[RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

Started byRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
First post2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
Last post2016-08-26 23:40 +0200
Articles 12 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
    [RFC PATCH 5/6] serio: add serial configuration functions Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
    [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write  and receive Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-08-26 22:20 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write  and receive Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-26 23:40 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write  and receive Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-08-27 00:30 +0200
    [RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add OF driver binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
    [RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add DT driver binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add DT driver binding Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-08-29 12:00 +0200
    [RFC PATCH 6/6] bluetooth: hack up ldisc to use serio Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-08-26 22:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-08-26 23:40 +0200

#1469781 — [RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH 0/6] UART slave devices using serio
Message-ID<s9PMm-17y-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
adding DT based device matching and supporting buffer based write and
receive.

Currently, I'm using the existing serio serport ldisc for testing. This
requires using inputattach to open the tty and set the ldisc which in
turn registers a serio port with the serio core:

inputattach -bare /dev/ttyAMA1

Once a tty_port based serio port driver is in place, this step will not
be needed. Supporting cases like a USB UART will also work if the USB
UART is described in DT. If not described in DT, I'm not sure if the
existing serio manual binding is sufficient (Need to figure out how that
works). Slave drivers also need other ways to specify additional data
using module params perhaps. Getting DT overlays to work for
non-discoverable devices behind discoverable buses (i.e. detached from
a base DT) is another option, but that's not yet supported in general.

I've done all the serio changes in place, but ultimately I think at
least the core of serio should be moved out of drivers/input/. I don't
think it belongs under drivers/tty/ or drivers/tty/serial/, so
drivers/serio/?

BT is working under QEMU to the point a slave driver can bind to a
serio port device via DT, register as a BT device, start sending out
initial packets and receive data (typed at a terminal). Now I need to
find a real device.

A git branch is available here[1]. Note it will get rebased.

Rob

[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git serial-bus-serio


Rob Herring (6):
  serio: add DT driver binding
  serio: serport: hacks to get DT probe to work
  serio: add buffer receive and write functions
  serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive
  serio: add serial configuration functions
  bluetooth: hack up ldisc to use serio

 drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h  |   3 +
 drivers/input/serio/serio.c   |  34 +++++-
 drivers/input/serio/serport.c |  49 ++++----
 include/linux/serio.h         |  59 +++++++++-
 5 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)

--
2.9.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469784 — [RFC PATCH 5/6] serio: add serial configuration functions

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH 5/6] serio: add serial configuration functions
Message-ID<s9PMm-17y-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469781
Just stub functions ATM.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/serio.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/serio.h b/include/linux/serio.h
index 5d0b69f..5bf1754 100644
--- a/include/linux/serio.h
+++ b/include/linux/serio.h
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ struct serio {
 	void (*close)(struct serio *);
 	int (*start)(struct serio *);
 	void (*stop)(struct serio *);
+	void (*set_flow_control)(struct serio *, bool);
+	unsigned int (*set_baudrate)(struct serio *, unsigned int);
 
 	struct serio *parent;
 	/* Entry in parent->children list */
@@ -170,6 +172,20 @@ static inline void serio_drv_write_wakeup(struct serio *serio)
 		serio->drv->write_wakeup(serio);
 }
 
+static inline void serio_set_flow_control(struct serio *serio, bool enable)
+{
+	if (serio->set_flow_control)
+		serio->set_flow_control(serio, enable);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int serio_set_baudrate(struct serio *serio, unsigned int speed)
+{
+	if (serio->set_baudrate)
+		return serio->set_baudrate(serio, speed);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Use the following functions to manipulate serio's per-port
  * driver-specific data.
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469789 — [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive
Message-ID<s9PMm-17y-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469781
A tty ldisc naturally supports writing a buffer at a time, so convert the
serport driver to use the serio write_buf() function. For clients using
the existing interfaces, there is no change in functionality.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/input/serio/serport.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/serport.c b/drivers/input/serio/serport.c
index a938c2b..5572c28 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/serport.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/serport.c
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ struct serport {
  * Callback functions from the serio code.
  */
 
-static int serport_serio_write(struct serio *serio, unsigned char data)
+static int serport_serio_write_buf(struct serio *serio, const unsigned char *data, size_t len)
 {
 	struct serport *serport = serio->port_data;
-	return -(serport->tty->ops->write(serport->tty, &data, 1) != 1);
+	return serport->tty->ops->write(serport->tty, data, len);
 }
 
 static int serport_serio_open(struct serio *serio)
@@ -133,26 +133,29 @@ static void serport_ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *c
 	if (!test_bit(SERPORT_ACTIVE, &serport->flags))
 		goto out;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-		if (fp) {
-			switch (fp[i]) {
-			case TTY_FRAME:
-				ch_flags = SERIO_FRAME;
-				break;
-
-			case TTY_PARITY:
-				ch_flags = SERIO_PARITY;
-				break;
-
-			default:
-				ch_flags = 0;
-				break;
+	if (serio_buffered_mode_enabled(serport->serio)) {
+		serio_receive_buf(serport->serio, cp, count);
+	} else {
+		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+			if (fp) {
+				switch (fp[i]) {
+				case TTY_FRAME:
+					ch_flags = SERIO_FRAME;
+					break;
+
+				case TTY_PARITY:
+					ch_flags = SERIO_PARITY;
+					break;
+
+				default:
+					ch_flags = 0;
+					break;
+				}
 			}
-		}
 
-		serio_interrupt(serport->serio, cp[i], ch_flags);
+			serio_interrupt(serport->serio, cp[i], ch_flags);
+		}
 	}
-
 out:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serport->lock, flags);
 }
@@ -179,7 +182,7 @@ static ssize_t serport_ldisc_read(struct tty_struct * tty, struct file * file, u
 	snprintf(serio->phys, sizeof(serio->phys), "%s/serio0", tty_name(tty));
 	serio->id = serport->id;
 	serio->id.type = SERIO_RS232;
-	serio->write = serport_serio_write;
+	serio->write_buf = serport_serio_write_buf;
 	serio->open = serport_serio_open;
 	serio->close = serport_serio_close;
 	serio->port_data = serport;
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1470978 — Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive

FromPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date2016-08-26 22:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive
Message-ID<savLA-3ml-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469789
Hi!

> @@ -133,26 +133,29 @@ static void serport_ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *c
>  	if (!test_bit(SERPORT_ACTIVE, &serport->flags))
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> -		if (fp) {
> -			switch (fp[i]) {
> -			case TTY_FRAME:
> -				ch_flags = SERIO_FRAME;
> -				break;
> -
> -			case TTY_PARITY:
> -				ch_flags = SERIO_PARITY;
> -				break;
> -
> -			default:
> -				ch_flags = 0;
> -				break;
> +	if (serio_buffered_mode_enabled(serport->serio)) {
> +		serio_receive_buf(serport->serio, cp, count);

Elsewhere:
+       /* Use buffer receive if the driver provides a callback */
+       if (drv->receive_buf)
+               set_bit(SERIO_MODE_BUFFERED, &drv->flags);

Could we use if (drv->receive_buf) above directly, and not require the
bitfield?

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1471007 — Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-26 23:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive
Message-ID<sax10-41h-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1470978
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> @@ -133,26 +133,29 @@ static void serport_ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *c
>>       if (!test_bit(SERPORT_ACTIVE, &serport->flags))
>>               goto out;
>>
>> -     for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> -             if (fp) {
>> -                     switch (fp[i]) {
>> -                     case TTY_FRAME:
>> -                             ch_flags = SERIO_FRAME;
>> -                             break;
>> -
>> -                     case TTY_PARITY:
>> -                             ch_flags = SERIO_PARITY;
>> -                             break;
>> -
>> -                     default:
>> -                             ch_flags = 0;
>> -                             break;
>> +     if (serio_buffered_mode_enabled(serport->serio)) {
>> +             serio_receive_buf(serport->serio, cp, count);
>
> Elsewhere:
> +       /* Use buffer receive if the driver provides a callback */
> +       if (drv->receive_buf)
> +               set_bit(SERIO_MODE_BUFFERED, &drv->flags);
>
> Could we use if (drv->receive_buf) above directly, and not require the
> bitfield?

I'm allowing for allowing drivers to provide both functions and be
able to switch between them. However, I didn't provide any mechanism
to do so yet.

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1471019 — Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive

FromPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date2016-08-27 00:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 4/6] serio: serport: add support for buffered write and receive
Message-ID<saxNn-4Bu-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1471007
On Fri 2016-08-26 16:27:35, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> @@ -133,26 +133,29 @@ static void serport_ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *c
> >>       if (!test_bit(SERPORT_ACTIVE, &serport->flags))
> >>               goto out;
> >>
> >> -     for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> >> -             if (fp) {
> >> -                     switch (fp[i]) {
> >> -                     case TTY_FRAME:
> >> -                             ch_flags = SERIO_FRAME;
> >> -                             break;
> >> -
> >> -                     case TTY_PARITY:
> >> -                             ch_flags = SERIO_PARITY;
> >> -                             break;
> >> -
> >> -                     default:
> >> -                             ch_flags = 0;
> >> -                             break;
> >> +     if (serio_buffered_mode_enabled(serport->serio)) {
> >> +             serio_receive_buf(serport->serio, cp, count);
> >
> > Elsewhere:
> > +       /* Use buffer receive if the driver provides a callback */
> > +       if (drv->receive_buf)
> > +               set_bit(SERIO_MODE_BUFFERED, &drv->flags);
> >
> > Could we use if (drv->receive_buf) above directly, and not require the
> > bitfield?
> 
> I'm allowing for allowing drivers to provide both functions and be
> able to switch between them. However, I didn't provide any mechanism
> to do so yet.

Dunno -- does switching make sense? IMO we'd want to migrate all the
drivers to the "blocks" interface... no need to switch between the
two.

Best regards,
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469791 — [RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add OF driver binding

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add OF driver binding
Message-ID<s9PMm-17y-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469781
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/input/serio/serio.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
index 1ca7f55..6cfa22f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@ucw.cz>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Serio abstraction core");
@@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ static void serio_disconnect_driver(struct serio *serio)
 
 static int serio_match_port(const struct serio_device_id *ids, struct serio *serio)
 {
-	while (ids->type || ids->proto) {
+	while (ids && (ids->type || ids->proto)) {
 		if ((ids->type == SERIO_ANY || ids->type == serio->id.type) &&
 		    (ids->proto == SERIO_ANY || ids->proto == serio->id.proto) &&
 		    (ids->extra == SERIO_ANY || ids->extra == serio->id.extra) &&
@@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ static int serio_bind_driver(struct serio *serio, struct serio_driver *drv)
 {
 	int error;
 
+	printk("%s\n", __func__);
 	if (serio_match_port(drv->id_table, serio)) {
 
 		serio->dev.driver = &drv->driver;
@@ -133,6 +135,7 @@ static void serio_find_driver(struct serio *serio)
 {
 	int error;
 
+	printk("%s\n", __func__);
 	error = device_attach(&serio->dev);
 	if (error < 0 && error != -EPROBE_DEFER)
 		dev_warn(&serio->dev,
@@ -542,8 +545,12 @@ static void serio_init_port(struct serio *serio)
 static void serio_add_port(struct serio *serio)
 {
 	struct serio *parent = serio->parent;
+	struct device_node *parent_node =
+		serio->dev.parent ? serio->dev.parent->of_node : NULL;
 	int error;
 
+	printk("%s\n", __func__);
+
 	if (parent) {
 		serio_pause_rx(parent);
 		list_add_tail(&serio->child_node, &parent->children);
@@ -555,6 +562,8 @@ static void serio_add_port(struct serio *serio)
 	if (serio->start)
 		serio->start(serio);
 
+	serio->dev.of_node = of_get_next_available_child(parent_node, NULL);
+
 	error = device_add(&serio->dev);
 	if (error)
 		dev_err(&serio->dev,
@@ -570,6 +579,8 @@ static void serio_destroy_port(struct serio *serio)
 {
 	struct serio *child;
 
+	printk("%s\n", __func__);
+
 	while ((child = serio_get_pending_child(serio)) != NULL) {
 		serio_remove_pending_events(child);
 		put_device(&child->dev);
@@ -791,6 +802,7 @@ static int serio_driver_probe(struct device *dev)
 	struct serio *serio = to_serio_port(dev);
 	struct serio_driver *drv = to_serio_driver(dev->driver);
 
+	printk("%s\n", __func__);
 	return serio_connect_driver(serio, drv);
 }
 
@@ -902,6 +914,12 @@ static int serio_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
 	struct serio *serio = to_serio_port(dev);
 	struct serio_driver *serio_drv = to_serio_driver(drv);
 
+	printk("%s\n", __func__);
+
+	if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv)) {
+		printk("matched %s\n", dev->of_node->name);
+		return 1;
+	}
 	if (serio->manual_bind || serio_drv->manual_bind)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469793 — [RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add DT driver binding

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add DT driver binding
Message-ID<s9PMn-17y-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469781
This adds DT driver binding support to the serio bus. The parent of the
serio port device must have a device_node associated with it. Typically,
this would be the UART device node. The slave device must be a child node
of the UART device node.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/input/serio/serio.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
index 1ca7f55..9e8eb7a 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@ucw.cz>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Serio abstraction core");
@@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ static void serio_disconnect_driver(struct serio *serio)
 
 static int serio_match_port(const struct serio_device_id *ids, struct serio *serio)
 {
-	while (ids->type || ids->proto) {
+	while (ids && (ids->type || ids->proto)) {
 		if ((ids->type == SERIO_ANY || ids->type == serio->id.type) &&
 		    (ids->proto == SERIO_ANY || ids->proto == serio->id.proto) &&
 		    (ids->extra == SERIO_ANY || ids->extra == serio->id.extra) &&
@@ -542,6 +543,8 @@ static void serio_init_port(struct serio *serio)
 static void serio_add_port(struct serio *serio)
 {
 	struct serio *parent = serio->parent;
+	struct device_node *parent_node =
+		serio->dev.parent ? serio->dev.parent->of_node : NULL;
 	int error;
 
 	if (parent) {
@@ -555,6 +558,8 @@ static void serio_add_port(struct serio *serio)
 	if (serio->start)
 		serio->start(serio);
 
+	serio->dev.of_node = of_get_next_available_child(parent_node, NULL);
+
 	error = device_add(&serio->dev);
 	if (error)
 		dev_err(&serio->dev,
@@ -902,6 +907,10 @@ static int serio_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
 	struct serio *serio = to_serio_port(dev);
 	struct serio_driver *serio_drv = to_serio_driver(drv);
 
+	if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv)) {
+		printk("matched %s\n", dev->of_node->name);
+		return 1;
+	}
 	if (serio->manual_bind || serio_drv->manual_bind)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1471683 — Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add DT driver binding

FromPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date2016-08-29 12:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 1/6] serio: add DT driver binding
Message-ID<sbrwd-5Fk-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469793
On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:31, Rob Herring wrote:
> This adds DT driver binding support to the serio bus. The parent of the
> serio port device must have a device_node associated with it. Typically,
> this would be the UART device node. The slave device must be a child node
> of the UART device node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Added vojtech to cc list, as he's original author.

> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
> index 1ca7f55..9e8eb7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@ucw.cz>");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Serio abstraction core");
> @@ -902,6 +907,10 @@ static int serio_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>  	struct serio *serio = to_serio_port(dev);
>  	struct serio_driver *serio_drv = to_serio_driver(drv);
>  
> +	if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv)) {
> +		printk("matched %s\n", dev->of_node->name);

printk probalby should be removed when moving out of RFC phase.

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469794 — [RFC PATCH 6/6] bluetooth: hack up ldisc to use serio

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-25 01:30 +0200
Subject[RFC PATCH 6/6] bluetooth: hack up ldisc to use serio
Message-ID<s9PMn-17y-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469781
This hacks up the BT ldisc in place to work as a serio driver. It will
need refactoring into common, ldisc, and serio parts.

It is working under QEMU to the point the driver can bind to a serio
device via DT, register as a BT device, start sending out initial
packets and receive data (typed at a terminal). Now I need to find a
real device.

Still need to figure out how to plumb a few tty things like
TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP bit handling and tty_unthrottle.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h  |   3 +
 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
index dda9739..8149952 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@
 #include <linux/poll.h>
 
 #include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/tty.h>
+#include <linux/serio.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/signal.h>
@@ -138,7 +140,7 @@ int hci_uart_tx_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
 static void hci_uart_write_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct hci_uart *hu = container_of(work, struct hci_uart, write_work);
-	struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
+	struct serio *serio = hu->serio;
 	struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
@@ -152,8 +154,8 @@ restart:
 	while ((skb = hci_uart_dequeue(hu))) {
 		int len;
 
-		set_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags);
-		len = tty->ops->write(tty, skb->data, skb->len);
+//		set_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags);
+		len = serio_write_buf(serio, skb->data, skb->len);
 		hdev->stat.byte_tx += len;
 
 		skb_pull(skb, len);
@@ -215,17 +217,15 @@ static int hci_uart_open(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 static int hci_uart_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 {
 	struct hci_uart *hu  = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
-	struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
 
-	BT_DBG("hdev %p tty %p", hdev, tty);
+	BT_DBG("hdev %p serio %p", hdev, hu->serio);
 
 	if (hu->tx_skb) {
 		kfree_skb(hu->tx_skb); hu->tx_skb = NULL;
 	}
 
 	/* Flush any pending characters in the driver and discipline. */
-	tty_ldisc_flush(tty);
-	tty_driver_flush_buffer(tty);
+	serio_write_flush(hu->serio);
 
 	if (test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, &hu->flags))
 		hu->proto->flush(hu);
@@ -261,6 +261,8 @@ static int hci_uart_send_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 /* Flow control or un-flow control the device */
 void hci_uart_set_flow_control(struct hci_uart *hu, bool enable)
 {
+	serio_set_flow_control(hu->serio, enable);
+#if 0
 	struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
 	struct ktermios ktermios;
 	int status;
@@ -309,6 +311,7 @@ void hci_uart_set_flow_control(struct hci_uart *hu, bool enable)
 		BT_DBG("Enabling hardware flow control: %s",
 		       status ? "failed" : "success");
 	}
+#endif
 }
 
 void hci_uart_set_speeds(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int init_speed,
@@ -317,7 +320,7 @@ void hci_uart_set_speeds(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int init_speed,
 	hu->init_speed = init_speed;
 	hu->oper_speed = oper_speed;
 }
-
+#if 0
 void hci_uart_init_tty(struct hci_uart *hu)
 {
 	struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
@@ -336,21 +339,13 @@ void hci_uart_init_tty(struct hci_uart *hu)
 	/* tty_set_termios() return not checked as it is always 0 */
 	tty_set_termios(tty, &ktermios);
 }
-
+#endif
 void hci_uart_set_baudrate(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed)
 {
-	struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
-	struct ktermios ktermios;
-
-	ktermios = tty->termios;
-	ktermios.c_cflag &= ~CBAUD;
-	tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(&ktermios, speed, speed);
-
-	/* tty_set_termios() return not checked as it is always 0 */
-	tty_set_termios(tty, &ktermios);
+	int out_speed = serio_set_baudrate(hu->serio, speed);
 
 	BT_DBG("%s: New tty speeds: %d/%d", hu->hdev->name,
-	       tty->termios.c_ispeed, tty->termios.c_ospeed);
+	       speed, out_speed);
 }
 
 static int hci_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
@@ -428,83 +423,6 @@ done:
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/* ------ LDISC part ------ */
-/* hci_uart_tty_open
- *
- *     Called when line discipline changed to HCI_UART.
- *
- * Arguments:
- *     tty    pointer to tty info structure
- * Return Value:
- *     0 if success, otherwise error code
- */
-static int hci_uart_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
-{
-	struct hci_uart *hu;
-
-	BT_DBG("tty %p", tty);
-
-	/* Error if the tty has no write op instead of leaving an exploitable
-	   hole */
-	if (tty->ops->write == NULL)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-	hu = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hci_uart), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!hu) {
-		BT_ERR("Can't allocate control structure");
-		return -ENFILE;
-	}
-
-	tty->disc_data = hu;
-	hu->tty = tty;
-	tty->receive_room = 65536;
-
-	INIT_WORK(&hu->init_ready, hci_uart_init_work);
-	INIT_WORK(&hu->write_work, hci_uart_write_work);
-
-	/* Flush any pending characters in the driver */
-	tty_driver_flush_buffer(tty);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/* hci_uart_tty_close()
- *
- *    Called when the line discipline is changed to something
- *    else, the tty is closed, or the tty detects a hangup.
- */
-static void hci_uart_tty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
-{
-	struct hci_uart *hu = tty->disc_data;
-	struct hci_dev *hdev;
-
-	BT_DBG("tty %p", tty);
-
-	/* Detach from the tty */
-	tty->disc_data = NULL;
-
-	if (!hu)
-		return;
-
-	hdev = hu->hdev;
-	if (hdev)
-		hci_uart_close(hdev);
-
-	cancel_work_sync(&hu->write_work);
-
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, &hu->flags)) {
-		if (hdev) {
-			if (test_bit(HCI_UART_REGISTERED, &hu->flags))
-				hci_unregister_dev(hdev);
-			hci_free_dev(hdev);
-		}
-		hu->proto->close(hu);
-	}
-	clear_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_SET, &hu->flags);
-
-	kfree(hu);
-}
-
 /* hci_uart_tty_wakeup()
  *
  *    Callback for transmit wakeup. Called when low level
@@ -513,18 +431,18 @@ static void hci_uart_tty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
  * Arguments:        tty    pointer to associated tty instance data
  * Return Value:    None
  */
-static void hci_uart_tty_wakeup(struct tty_struct *tty)
+static void hci_uart_serio_wakeup(struct serio *serio)
 {
-	struct hci_uart *hu = tty->disc_data;
+	struct hci_uart *hu = serio_get_drvdata(serio);
 
 	BT_DBG("");
 
 	if (!hu)
 		return;
 
-	clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags);
+//	clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags);
 
-	if (tty != hu->tty)
+	if (serio != hu->serio)
 		return;
 
 	if (test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, &hu->flags))
@@ -543,16 +461,16 @@ static void hci_uart_tty_wakeup(struct tty_struct *tty)
  *
  * Return Value:    None
  */
-static void hci_uart_tty_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
-				 char *flags, int count)
+static int hci_uart_serio_receive(struct serio *serio, const u8 *data,
+				   size_t count)
 {
-	struct hci_uart *hu = tty->disc_data;
+	struct hci_uart *hu = serio_get_drvdata(serio);
 
-	if (!hu || tty != hu->tty)
-		return;
+	if (!hu || serio != hu->serio)
+		return 0;
 
 	if (!test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, &hu->flags))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	/* It does not need a lock here as it is already protected by a mutex in
 	 * tty caller
@@ -562,7 +480,8 @@ static void hci_uart_tty_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
 	if (hu->hdev)
 		hu->hdev->stat.byte_rx += count;
 
-	tty_unthrottle(tty);
+//	tty_unthrottle(tty);
+	return count;
 }
 
 static int hci_uart_register_dev(struct hci_uart *hu)
@@ -595,7 +514,7 @@ static int hci_uart_register_dev(struct hci_uart *hu)
 	hdev->flush = hci_uart_flush;
 	hdev->send  = hci_uart_send_frame;
 	hdev->setup = hci_uart_setup;
-	SET_HCIDEV_DEV(hdev, hu->tty->dev);
+	SET_HCIDEV_DEV(hdev, &hu->serio->dev);
 
 	if (test_bit(HCI_UART_RAW_DEVICE, &hu->hdev_flags))
 		set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_RAW_DEVICE, &hdev->quirks);
@@ -650,6 +569,7 @@ static int hci_uart_set_proto(struct hci_uart *hu, int id)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#if 0
 
 static int hci_uart_set_flags(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned long flags)
 {
@@ -733,56 +653,95 @@ static int hci_uart_tty_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
 
 	return err;
 }
+#endif
 
-/*
- * We don't provide read/write/poll interface for user space.
- */
-static ssize_t hci_uart_tty_read(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
-				 unsigned char __user *buf, size_t nr)
+static int hci_uart_connect(struct serio *serio, struct serio_driver *drv)
 {
-	return 0;
-}
+	int id, ret;
+	struct hci_uart *hu;
+
+	BT_INFO("HCI UART driver ver %s", VERSION);
+
+	id = (int)of_device_get_match_data(&serio->dev);
+
+	hu = devm_kzalloc(&serio->dev, sizeof(struct hci_uart), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!hu)
+		return -ENFILE;
+
+	serio_set_drvdata(serio, hu);
+	hu->serio = serio;
+
+//	tty->receive_room = 65536;
+
+	INIT_WORK(&hu->init_ready, hci_uart_init_work);
+	INIT_WORK(&hu->write_work, hci_uart_write_work);
+
+	ret = serio_open(serio, drv);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	set_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_SET, &hu->flags);
+	ret = hci_uart_set_proto(hu, id);
+	if (ret) {
+		serio_close(serio);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* Flush any pending characters in the driver */
+//	tty_driver_flush_buffer(tty);
 
-static ssize_t hci_uart_tty_write(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
-				  const unsigned char *data, size_t count)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
 
-static unsigned int hci_uart_tty_poll(struct tty_struct *tty,
-				      struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
-{
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int __init hci_uart_init(void)
+static void hci_uart_disconnect(struct serio *serio)
 {
-	static struct tty_ldisc_ops hci_uart_ldisc;
-	int err;
+	struct hci_dev *hdev;
+	struct hci_uart *hu = serio_get_drvdata(serio);
 
-	BT_INFO("HCI UART driver ver %s", VERSION);
+	hdev = hu->hdev;
+	if (hdev)
+		hci_uart_close(hdev);
 
-	/* Register the tty discipline */
-
-	memset(&hci_uart_ldisc, 0, sizeof(hci_uart_ldisc));
-	hci_uart_ldisc.magic		= TTY_LDISC_MAGIC;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.name		= "n_hci";
-	hci_uart_ldisc.open		= hci_uart_tty_open;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.close		= hci_uart_tty_close;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.read		= hci_uart_tty_read;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.write		= hci_uart_tty_write;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.ioctl		= hci_uart_tty_ioctl;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.poll		= hci_uart_tty_poll;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.receive_buf	= hci_uart_tty_receive;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.write_wakeup	= hci_uart_tty_wakeup;
-	hci_uart_ldisc.owner		= THIS_MODULE;
-
-	err = tty_register_ldisc(N_HCI, &hci_uart_ldisc);
-	if (err) {
-		BT_ERR("HCI line discipline registration failed. (%d)", err);
-		return err;
+	cancel_work_sync(&hu->write_work);
+
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, &hu->flags)) {
+		if (hdev) {
+			if (test_bit(HCI_UART_REGISTERED, &hu->flags))
+				hci_unregister_dev(hdev);
+			hci_free_dev(hdev);
+		}
+		hu->proto->close(hu);
 	}
+	clear_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_SET, &hu->flags);
+
+	pr_info("hci_uart disconnect!!!\n");
+	serio_close(serio);
+}
+
+
+static const struct of_device_id hci_uart_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "loopback-uart", .data = (void *)HCI_UART_BCSP },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, hci_uart_of_match);
+
+static struct serio_driver serio_hci_uart_drv = {
+	.driver		= {
+		.name	= "hci-uart",
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(hci_uart_of_match),
+	},
+	.description	= "hci uart",
+	.write_wakeup	= hci_uart_serio_wakeup,
+	.receive_buf	= hci_uart_serio_receive,
+	.connect	= hci_uart_connect,
+	.disconnect	= hci_uart_disconnect,
+};
 
+module_serio_driver(serio_hci_uart_drv);
+
+static int __init hci_uart_init(void)
+{
 #ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_H4
 	h4_init();
 #endif
@@ -816,8 +775,6 @@ static int __init hci_uart_init(void)
 
 static void __exit hci_uart_exit(void)
 {
-	int err;
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_H4
 	h4_deinit();
 #endif
@@ -845,11 +802,6 @@ static void __exit hci_uart_exit(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_AG6XX
 	ag6xx_deinit();
 #endif
-
-	/* Release tty registration of line discipline */
-	err = tty_unregister_ldisc(N_HCI);
-	if (err)
-		BT_ERR("Can't unregister HCI line discipline (%d)", err);
 }
 
 module_init(hci_uart_init);
@@ -859,4 +811,3 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Bluetooth HCI UART driver ver " VERSION);
 MODULE_VERSION(VERSION);
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_ALIAS_LDISC(N_HCI);
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h
index 839bad1..c48dddc 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h
@@ -73,8 +73,11 @@ struct hci_uart_proto {
 	struct sk_buff *(*dequeue)(struct hci_uart *hu);
 };
 
+struct serio;
+
 struct hci_uart {
 	struct tty_struct	*tty;
+	struct serio		*serio;
 	struct hci_dev		*hdev;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		hdev_flags;
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1470975

FromPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date2016-08-26 22:10 +0200
Message-ID<savBU-3hs-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469781
On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
> and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
> adding DT based device matching and supporting buffer based write and
> receive.

Strange, the series has _two_ 1/6 patches.

> Rob Herring (6):
>   serio: add DT driver binding

There's one saying "add OF driver binding" on the mailinglist, too...
Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1471003

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-26 23:40 +0200
Message-ID<sax0Z-41h-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1470975
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote:
>> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
>> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
>> and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
>> adding DT based device matching and supporting buffer based write and
>> receive.
>
> Strange, the series has _two_ 1/6 patches.
>
>> Rob Herring (6):
>>   serio: add DT driver binding
>
> There's one saying "add OF driver binding" on the mailinglist, too...

Ugg, ignore that one. That's what I get for not cleaning out patches
before refreshing them with git-format-patch.

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web