Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1469778 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-25 01:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 01:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 01/11] clk: microchip: use readl_poll_timeout() in pbclk_set_rate(). Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-25 01:20 +0200
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/11] clk: microchip: use readl_poll_timeout() in pbclk_set_rate(). |
| Message-ID | <s9PCG-13S-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 05/17, Purna Chandra Mandal wrote: > pbclk_set_rate() is using readl_poll_timeout_atomic() even > though spinlock is released. Fix it by replacing with > readl_poll_timeout(). > > Signed-off-by: Purna Chandra Mandal <purna.mandal@microchip.com> > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web