Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1469683 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0/6 linux-next] ext4: fix extent leaking and clean-up Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> - 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200
[PATCH 5/6 linux-next] ext4: remove unused definition Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> - 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200
[PATCH 6/6 linux-next] ext4: fix memory leak in ext4_insert_range() Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> - 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/6 linux-next] ext4: remove unneeded test in ext4_alloc_file_blocks() Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> - 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200
| From | Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/6 linux-next] ext4: fix extent leaking and clean-up |
| Message-ID | <s9MEN-7el-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Last patch of this small patchset fixes an extent path memory leak. The rest is some clean-up. Fabian Frederick (6): ext4: avoid EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS double checking ext4: remove unneeded test in ext4_alloc_file_blocks() ext4: create EXT4_MAX_BLOCKS() macro ext4: use bool for check in ext4_ext_space_() ext4: remove unused definition ext4: fix memory leak in ext4_insert_range() fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 +++ fs/ext4/extents.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------- fs/ext4/file.c | 3 +-- fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 2 -- 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) -- 2.8.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 5/6 linux-next] ext4: remove unused definition |
| Message-ID | <s9MEN-7el-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1469683 |
MAX_32_NUM isn't used in ext4 Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> --- fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c index 10686fd..5a708c87 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ #include "ext4_jbd2.h" #include "ext4.h" -#define MAX_32_NUM ((((unsigned long long) 1) << 32) - 1) - /** * Swap memory between @a and @b for @len bytes. * -- 2.8.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 6/6 linux-next] ext4: fix memory leak in ext4_insert_range() |
| Message-ID | <s9MEO-7el-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1469683 |
Running xfstests generic/013 with kmemleak gives the following:
unreferenced object 0xffff8801d3d27de0 (size 96):
comm "fsstress", pid 4941, jiffies 4294860168 (age 53.485s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff818eaaf3>] kmemleak_alloc+0x23/0x40
[<ffffffff81179805>] __kmalloc+0xf5/0x1d0
[<ffffffff8122ef5c>] ext4_find_extent+0x1ec/0x2f0
[<ffffffff8123530c>] ext4_insert_range+0x34c/0x4a0
[<ffffffff81235942>] ext4_fallocate+0x4e2/0x8b0
[<ffffffff81181334>] vfs_fallocate+0x134/0x210
[<ffffffff8118203f>] SyS_fallocate+0x3f/0x60
[<ffffffff818efa9b>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x8f
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Problem seems mitigated by dropping refs and freeing path
when there's no path[depth].p_ext
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 5b0913d..2774df4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -5711,6 +5711,9 @@ int ext4_insert_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
goto out_stop;
}
+ } else {
+ ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
+ kfree(path);
}
ret = ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, offset_lblk,
--
2.8.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/6 linux-next] ext4: remove unneeded test in ext4_alloc_file_blocks() |
| Message-ID | <s9MEN-7el-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1469683 |
ext4_alloc_file_blocks() is called from ext4_zero_range() and
ext4_fallocate() both already testing EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS
We can call ext_depth(inode) unconditionnally.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 5d9f99a..4f1cca8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4693,13 +4693,7 @@ static int ext4_alloc_file_blocks(struct file *file, ext4_lblk_t offset,
* credits to insert 1 extent into extent tree
*/
credits = ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode, len);
- /*
- * We can only call ext_depth() on extent based inodes
- */
- if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))
- depth = ext_depth(inode);
- else
- depth = -1;
+ depth = ext_depth(inode);
retry:
while (ret >= 0 && len) {
--
2.8.1
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web