Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1463097 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-15 21:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-18 00:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 7 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
BUG and WARN kernel log levels Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2016-08-15 21:00 +0200
Re: BUG and WARN kernel log levels Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-15 21:10 +0200
Re: BUG and WARN kernel log levels Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2016-08-15 22:30 +0200
Re: BUG and WARN kernel log levels Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-15 22:40 +0200
Re: BUG and WARN kernel log levels Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-17 18:40 +0200
Re: BUG and WARN kernel log levels Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2016-08-17 23:30 +0200
Re: BUG and WARN kernel log levels Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-18 00:50 +0200
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 21:00 +0200 |
| Subject | BUG and WARN kernel log levels |
| Message-ID | <s6vh8-LT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
#define BUG() do { \
printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
Seems like it should have one?
Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:
$ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
2735
$ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
77
If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.
How do you think is best to clean this up?
Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
BUGish call that takes a format...
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s6vqP-14k-55@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1463097 |
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> #define BUG() do { \
> printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
>
> Seems like it should have one?
>
> Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
> a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:
>
> $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
> 2735
>
> $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
> 77
>
> If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
> log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.
>
> How do you think is best to clean this up?
>
> Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
> BUGish call that takes a format...
I once suggested something similar awhile ago.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/8/261
I think it's best to remove any KERN_<LEVEL> from the use of
all the WARN variants and add it to the WARN definitions.
Same with BUG.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s6wGd-1PM-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1463105 |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>>
>> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
>> #define BUG() do { \
>> printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
>>
>> Seems like it should have one?
>>
>> Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
>> a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:
>>
>> $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
>> 2735
>>
>> $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
>> 77
>>
>> If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
>> log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.
>>
>> How do you think is best to clean this up?
>>
>> Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
>> BUGish call that takes a format...
>
> I once suggested something similar awhile ago.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/8/261
>
> I think it's best to remove any KERN_<LEVEL> from the use of
> all the WARN variants and add it to the WARN definitions.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. It does mean that the format
needs to be a const char string, though. I haven't checked all of them
but most seem to be. It's an easy fix to move them to "%s" as needed,
though.
> Same with BUG.
Yeah, though for full effect, it needs to be plumbed into each
architecture's BUG handler. Mainly what I don't like is that if I do
this on x86:
pr_err("eek, terrible thing\n");
BUG();
I get a dmesg that read:
eek, terrible thing
=== cut here ===
...traceback, etc
I'd like the "eek" part to be inside the "cut here". And I'd like BUGs
to be able to be more verbose.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s6wPT-1T2-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1463156 |
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 13:28 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
> > >
> > > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > > #define BUG() do { \
> > > printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
> > >
> > > Seems like it should have one?
> > >
> > > Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
> > > a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:
> > >
> > > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
> > > 2735
> > >
> > > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
> > > 77
> > >
> > > If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
> > > log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.
> > >
> > > How do you think is best to clean this up?
> > >
> > > Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
> > > BUGish call that takes a format...
> > I once suggested something similar awhile ago.
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/8/261
> >
> > I think it's best to remove any KERN_ from the use of
> > all the WARN variants and add it to the WARN definitions.
> Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. It does mean that the format
> needs to be a const char string, though.
No it doesn't mean that.
Prefixing KERN_WARNING to the const char[] types and using
KERN_WARNING "%pV" could work for the non const char[] types
Or maybe use the same KERN_WARNING "%pV" for simpler code.
> > Same with BUG.
> Yeah, though for full effect, it needs to be plumbed into each
> architecture's BUG handler. Mainly what I don't like is that if I do
> this on x86:
>
> pr_err("eek, terrible thing\n");
> BUG();
>
> I get a dmesg that read:
>
> eek, terrible thing
> === cut here ===
> ...traceback, etc
>
> I'd like the "eek" part to be inside the "cut here". And I'd like BUGs
> to be able to be more verbose.
Maybe add BUG_MSG/BUG_ON_MSG or some such.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s7c2J-3xu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1463105 |
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
> >
> > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > #define BUG() do { \
> > printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
> >
> > Seems like it should have one?
> >
> > Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
> > a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:
> >
> > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
> > 2735
> >
> > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
> > 77
> >
> > If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
> > log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.
> >
> > How do you think is best to clean this up?
> >
> > Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
> > BUGish call that takes a format...
> I once suggested something similar awhile ago.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/8/261
And here I submitted patches:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/30/176
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s7gzn-6R5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1464653 |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
>> >
>> > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
>> > #define BUG() do { \
>> > printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
>> >
>> > Seems like it should have one?
>> >
>> > Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
>> > a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:
>> >
>> > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
>> > 2735
>> >
>> > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
>> > 77
>> >
>> > If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
>> > log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.
>> >
>> > How do you think is best to clean this up?
>> >
>> > Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
>> > BUGish call that takes a format...
>> I once suggested something similar awhile ago.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/8/261
>
> And here I submitted patches:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/30/176
Ah, I see some of this series landed. I see commits scattered in the
tree, but not as many as you sent, I think. What still remains?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s7hON-7EL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1464810 |
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:19 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: [] > > And here I submitted patches: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/30/176 > Ah, I see some of this series landed. I see commits scattered in the > tree, but not as many as you sent, I think. What still remains? No idea. There wasn't any enthusiasm to apply the asm-generic patch so I didn't push it.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web