Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1464245 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-17 02:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-17 04:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] tools/power/acpi/acpidbg: Use new flushing mechanism "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-08-17 02:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v4 2/3] tools/power/acpi/acpidbg: Use new flushing mechanism "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2016-08-17 04:50 +0200
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 02:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] tools/power/acpi/acpidbg: Use new flushing mechanism |
| Message-ID | <s6WU2-1Ld-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 07:01:39 PM Lv Zheng wrote: > This patch converts tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidbg/acpidbg to use the new > flushing mechanism. I guess it will use the flush interface provided by the kernel instead of the previously existing flush implementation in user space? Thanks, Rafael
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 04:50 +0200 |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH v4 2/3] tools/power/acpi/acpidbg: Use new flushing mechanism |
| Message-ID | <s6Z5v-3gS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1464245 |
Hi, Rafael > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net] > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] tools/power/acpi/acpidbg: Use new flushing mechanism > > On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 07:01:39 PM Lv Zheng wrote: > > This patch converts tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidbg/acpidbg to use the new > > flushing mechanism. > > I guess it will use the flush interface provided by the kernel instead of the > previously existing flush implementation in user space? Yes. The existing user space flush implementation is just a compromise during the period the kernel flush is not ready. Thanks Lv
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web