Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1460708 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-11 19:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-11 22:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 1/1] percpu-refcount: init ->confirm_switch member properly Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> - 2016-08-11 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] percpu-refcount: init ->confirm_switch member properly Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-08-11 22:30 +0200
| From | Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-11 19:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/1] percpu-refcount: init ->confirm_switch member properly |
| Message-ID | <s51XR-6Q4-57@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This patch targets two things which are related to ->confirm_switch:
1. Init ->confirm_switch pointer with NULL on percpu_ref_init() or
kernel frightfully complains with WARN_ON_ONCE(ref->confirm_switch)
at __percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic if memory chunk was not properly
zeroed.
2. Warn if RCU callback is still in progress on percpu_ref_exit().
The race still exists, because percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu()
drops ->confirm_switch to NULL early, but that is only a warning
and still the caller is responsible that ref is no longer in
active use. Hopefully that can help to catch incorrect usage
of percpu-refcount.
Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
lib/percpu-refcount.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/percpu-refcount.c b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
index 6111bcb..9c110e0 100644
--- a/lib/percpu-refcount.c
+++ b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ int percpu_ref_init(struct percpu_ref *ref, percpu_ref_func_t *release,
atomic_long_set(&ref->count, start_count);
ref->release = release;
+ ref->confirm_switch = NULL;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_ref_init);
@@ -101,6 +102,11 @@ void percpu_ref_exit(struct percpu_ref *ref)
unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count = percpu_count_ptr(ref);
if (percpu_count) {
+ /*
+ * Non-NULL ->confirm_switch is used to indicate that
+ * switching is in progress.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ref->confirm_switch);
free_percpu(percpu_count);
ref->percpu_count_ptr = __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC_DEAD;
}
--
2.9.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-11 22:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] percpu-refcount: init ->confirm_switch member properly |
| Message-ID | <s54M2-fM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1460708 |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:27:09PM +0200, Roman Pen wrote: > This patch targets two things which are related to ->confirm_switch: > > 1. Init ->confirm_switch pointer with NULL on percpu_ref_init() or > kernel frightfully complains with WARN_ON_ONCE(ref->confirm_switch) > at __percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic if memory chunk was not properly > zeroed. > > 2. Warn if RCU callback is still in progress on percpu_ref_exit(). > The race still exists, because percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu() > drops ->confirm_switch to NULL early, but that is only a warning > and still the caller is responsible that ref is no longer in > active use. Hopefully that can help to catch incorrect usage > of percpu-refcount. > > Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Applied to percpu/for-4.9. Thanks. -- tejun
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web