Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1457386 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-07 00:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-09 14:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v2 02/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> - 2016-08-07 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-08-09 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> - 2016-08-09 14:20 +0200
| From | Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 00:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 02/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll |
| Message-ID | <s3hNo-2UZ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%) it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rare cases, even in this case it's not bad to print just 0. Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> --- drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 8972bf6..85ee9f5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -793,9 +793,7 @@ static int cpsw_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget) } } - if (num_tx) - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); - + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); return num_tx; } @@ -814,9 +812,7 @@ static int cpsw_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget) } } - if (num_rx) - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); - + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); return num_rx; } -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-09 13:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll |
| Message-ID | <s4dy2-6VH-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1457386 |
On 08/06/2016 01:48 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%) > it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rare cases, even in this case > it's not bad to print just 0. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > index 8972bf6..85ee9f5 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > @@ -793,9 +793,7 @@ static int cpsw_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget) > } > } > > - if (num_tx) > - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); > - > + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); I think, this dbg log can be just dropped as it seems not very useful. This also will allow to drop patch [PATCH v2 12/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix int dbg message > return num_tx; > } > > @@ -814,9 +812,7 @@ static int cpsw_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget) > } > } > > - if (num_rx) > - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); > - > + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); Same here. > return num_rx; > } > > -- regards, -grygorii
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-09 14:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll |
| Message-ID | <s4eaK-7rr-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1458635 |
On 09.08.16 14:29, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 08/06/2016 01:48 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >> No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%) >> it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rare cases, even in this case >> it's not bad to print just 0. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 8 ++------ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >> index 8972bf6..85ee9f5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >> @@ -793,9 +793,7 @@ static int cpsw_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget) >> } >> } >> >> - if (num_tx) >> - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); >> - >> + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); > > I think, this dbg log can be just dropped as it seems not very useful. > This also will allow to drop patch [PATCH v2 12/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix int dbg message That was my first thought, but I worried about someone can use it. If no one has objection, I'll drop the patch 12 and delete "poll" print at all. > >> return num_tx; >> } >> >> @@ -814,9 +812,7 @@ static int cpsw_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget) >> } >> } >> >> - if (num_rx) >> - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); >> - >> + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); > > Same here. > >> return num_rx; >> } >> >> > > -- Regards, Ivan Khoronzhuk
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web