Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1459706 > unrolled thread

Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err()

Started bySF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
First post2016-08-10 21:50 +0200
Last post2016-08-12 18:40 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-10 21:50 +0200
    Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-11 09:10 +0200
      Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-12 15:10 +0200
        Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err() Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-12 18:40 +0200

#1459706 — Re: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2016-08-10 21:50 +0200
SubjectRe: staging: ks7010: Replace three printk() calls by pr_err()
Message-ID<s4HFM-12V-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
>> Please and and use pr_fmt
> 
> Can't we use dev_* on the SDIO device?

How should a connection be constructed from the data structure "sdio_device_id"
to the corresponding device information for such an use case?

Regards,
Markus

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1460204

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-08-11 09:10 +0200
Message-ID<s4ShP-8tK-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1459706

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:41:37PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Please and and use pr_fmt
> > 
> > Can't we use dev_* on the SDIO device?
> 
> How should a connection be constructed from the data structure "sdio_device_id"
> to the corresponding device information for such an use case?

What did you try so far?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1461161

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2016-08-12 15:10 +0200
Message-ID<s5knL-22z-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1460204
>>> Can't we use dev_* on the SDIO device?
>>
>> How should a connection be constructed from the data structure "sdio_device_id"
>> to the corresponding device information for such an use case?
> 
> What did you try so far?

Nothing what I would find noteworthy for increasing the usage of a function
like "dev_err".

Are you on "a mission" to improve software around logging calls a bit more?

Regards,
Markus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1461314

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-08-12 18:40 +0200
Message-ID<s5nF0-44y-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1461161

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

> Nothing what I would find noteworthy for increasing the usage of a function
> like "dev_err".
> 
> Are you on "a mission" to improve software around logging calls a bit more?

I have two of those cards and I would like to know which one caused an
error. dev_err helps with exactly that.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web