Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1457371 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-06 23:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-08 20:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [GIT PULL] platform-drivers-x86 for 4.8-2 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-08-06 23:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] platform-drivers-x86 for 4.8-2 Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2016-08-08 19:00 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] platform-drivers-x86 for 4.8-2 Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2016-08-08 20:50 +0200
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 23:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] platform-drivers-x86 for 4.8-2 |
| Message-ID | <s3hu2-2MG-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Minor platform specific event handling updates and a Kconfig cleanup.
No. You already sent a *different* copy of all of these except for the
dell-wmi one in a previous pull requests.
This pull request gets me four new commits, but three of them I
already had. From you.
See for example your new commit
2dd73625dedc platform/x86: Drop duplicate dependencies on X86
vs
25789f95a883 platform/x86: Drop duplicate dependencies on X86
which are identical patches, just different dates.
Why should I pull a branch that is this confused?
It's not like I got those patches from somebody else, and there was
just a mis-communication about who should apply them. They were both
from *you*. That old commit came in in 4.7-rc4, so it's not even all
that recent.
Linus
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s3W4f-3QC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1457371 |
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:23:09PM -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > Minor platform specific event handling updates and a Kconfig cleanup. > > No. You already sent a *different* copy of all of these except for the > dell-wmi one in a previous pull requests. Well that is pretty terrible on my part. I screwed up in my management of my fixes branch. I'll dig through this to make sure I didn't mess up anything else and submit a new pull request for anything missing. Apologies Linus. > > This pull request gets me four new commits, but three of them I > already had. From you. > > See for example your new commit > > 2dd73625dedc platform/x86: Drop duplicate dependencies on X86 > > vs > > 25789f95a883 platform/x86: Drop duplicate dependencies on X86 > > which are identical patches, just different dates. > > Why should I pull a branch that is this confused? > > It's not like I got those patches from somebody else, and there was > just a mis-communication about who should apply them. They were both > from *you*. That old commit came in in 4.7-rc4, so it's not even all > that recent. > > Linus > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 20:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s3XMC-52s-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1457917 |
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:54:42AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:23:09PM -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > > > Minor platform specific event handling updates and a Kconfig cleanup. > > > > No. You already sent a *different* copy of all of these except for the > > dell-wmi one in a previous pull requests. > > Well that is pretty terrible on my part. I screwed up in my management of my > fixes branch. I'll dig through this to make sure I didn't mess up anything else > and submit a new pull request for anything missing. > > Apologies Linus. I identified what I did wrong and have updated my process and my tooling. While this should never happen, if it does, my tagging script now performs a "git cherry -v master $TAG" which will catch any previously merged commits, and aborts. New pull request with just the one patch momentarily. Sorry for the noise, and thank you for catching it. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web