Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1457912 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous  systems Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-08-08 18:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous  systems Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-08-09 12:10 +0200

#1457912 — Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:40:40PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Patches high level description:
> 
>  o 01/08 introduces documentation for the new optional DT binding
>  o [02-06]/08 add cpu-capacity attribute to TC2, Juno and Juno r2 DTs and
>    provide parsing of such information at boot time
>  o [07-08]/08 introduce sysfs attribute
> 

So generally ok with me; there does seem to be an unfortunate
duplication of code between arm and arm64 but other than that it looks
fine.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1458563

Hi,

On 08/08/16 18:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:40:40PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Patches high level description:
> > 
> >  o 01/08 introduces documentation for the new optional DT binding
> >  o [02-06]/08 add cpu-capacity attribute to TC2, Juno and Juno r2 DTs and
> >    provide parsing of such information at boot time
> >  o [07-08]/08 introduce sysfs attribute
> > 
> 
> So generally ok with me;

Thanks for reviewing.

> there does seem to be an unfortunate
> duplication of code between arm and arm64 but other than that it looks
> fine.
> 

Yes, I know. I'm failing to see how we can cleanly remove that
duplication, though (sysfs interface and callback functions being good
candidates for a common place).

Anyone any ideas?

Best,

- Juri

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web