Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1452021 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-28 19:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-05 17:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
tile-srom and krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defect Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-07-28 19:30 +0200
possible krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defects Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-07-28 20:20 +0200
[PATCH] tile-srom: avoid krealloc(... __GFP_ZERO) pattern Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> - 2016-07-28 21:10 +0200
Re: possible krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defects Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-08-05 13:40 +0200
Re: possible krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defects Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-05 17:30 +0200
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-28 19:30 +0200 |
| Subject | tile-srom and krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defect |
| Message-ID | <rZXi9-St-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello Chris,
There is a defect in krealloc with __GFP_ZERO so this code in
drivers/chat/tile-srom.c may not work properly:
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- for (i = 0; ; i++) {
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- int devhdl;
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- char buf[20];
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- struct srom_dev *new_srom_devices =
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
drivers/char/tile-srom.c: GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- if (!new_srom_devices) {
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- result = -ENOMEM;
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- goto fail_mem;
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- }
drivers/char/tile-srom.c- srom_devices = new_srom_devices;
http://linux-kernel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/xyiQV3vf/slab-krealloc-with-gfp-zero-defect
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-28 20:20 +0200 |
| Subject | possible krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defects |
| Message-ID | <rZY4x-1oK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1452021 |
(forwarding to the maintainers of other uses)
On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 10:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> There is a defect in krealloc with __GFP_ZERO so this code in
> drivers/chat/tile-srom.c may not work properly:
>
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- int devhdl;
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- char buf[20];
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- struct srom_dev *new_srom_devices =
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c: GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- if (!new_srom_devices) {
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- result = -ENOMEM;
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- goto fail_mem;
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- }
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c- srom_devices = new_srom_devices;
>
> http://linux-kernel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/xyiQV3vf/slab-krealloc-with-gfp-zero-defect
Here are the other in-tree uses that may not work properly
$ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "krealloc[^;]+__GFP_ZERO" *
drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:87: temp_page = krealloc(cap_info->pages,
pages_needed * sizeof(void *),
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
drivers/char/tile-srom.c:375: krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:521: p = krealloc(si->btn, si->si_ofs.btn_keys_size,
GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:565: p = krealloc(si->xy_mode, si->si_ofs.mode_size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:570: p = krealloc(si->xy_data, si->si_ofs.data_size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:575: p = krealloc(si->btn_rec_data,
si->si_ofs.btn_rec_size * si->si_ofs.num_btns,
GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
sound/hda/array.c:28: nlist = krealloc(array->list, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
sound/core/info.c:342: char *nbuf = krealloc(buf->buffer, PAGE_ALIGN(next),
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-28 21:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] tile-srom: avoid krealloc(... __GFP_ZERO) pattern |
| Message-ID | <rZYQV-20O-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1452037 |
Joe Perches points out [1] that this pattern isn't currently safe.
This driver doesn't really need the zeroing semantic anyway;
by restructuring the code slightly we can initialize all the
fields of the structure up front instead.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469729491.3998.58.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/char/tile-srom.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tile-srom.c b/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
index 69f6b4acc377..398800edb2cc 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
@@ -331,13 +331,11 @@ static const struct file_operations srom_fops = {
/**
* srom_setup_minor() - Initialize per-minor information.
* @srom: Per-device SROM state.
- * @index: Device to set up.
+ * @devhdl: Partition device handle.
*/
-static int srom_setup_minor(struct srom_dev *srom, int index)
+static int srom_setup_minor(struct srom_dev *srom, int devhdl)
{
- struct device *dev;
- int devhdl = srom->hv_devhdl;
-
+ srom->hv_devhdl = devhdl;
mutex_init(&srom->lock);
if (_srom_read(devhdl, &srom->total_size,
@@ -350,9 +348,7 @@ static int srom_setup_minor(struct srom_dev *srom, int index)
SROM_PAGE_SIZE_OFF, sizeof(srom->page_size)) < 0)
return -EIO;
- dev = device_create(srom_class, &srom_parent->dev,
- MKDEV(srom_major, index), srom, "%d", index);
- return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dev);
+ return 0;
}
/** srom_init() - Initialize the driver's module. */
@@ -365,7 +361,7 @@ static int srom_init(void)
* Start with a plausible number of partitions; the krealloc() call
* below will yield about log(srom_devs) additional allocations.
*/
- srom_devices = kzalloc(4 * sizeof(struct srom_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ srom_devices = kmalloc(4 * sizeof(struct srom_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
/* Discover the number of srom partitions. */
for (i = 0; ; i++) {
@@ -373,7 +369,7 @@ static int srom_init(void)
char buf[20];
struct srom_dev *new_srom_devices =
krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_srom_devices) {
result = -ENOMEM;
goto fail_mem;
@@ -387,7 +383,9 @@ static int srom_init(void)
i, devhdl);
break;
}
- srom_devices[i].hv_devhdl = devhdl;
+ result = srom_setup_minor(&srom_devices[i], devhdl);
+ if (result != 0)
+ goto fail_mem;
}
srom_devs = i;
@@ -431,9 +429,13 @@ static int srom_init(void)
srom_class->dev_groups = srom_dev_groups;
srom_class->devnode = srom_devnode;
- /* Do per-partition initialization */
+ /* Create per-partition devices */
for (i = 0; i < srom_devs; i++) {
- result = srom_setup_minor(srom_devices + i, i);
+ struct device *dev =
+ device_create(srom_class, &srom_parent->dev,
+ MKDEV(srom_major, i), srom_devices + i,
+ "%d", i);
+ result = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dev);
if (result < 0)
goto fail_class;
}
--
2.7.2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 13:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: possible krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defects |
| Message-ID | <s2LDQ-6UN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1452037 |
On Thu, 28 Jul, at 11:11:31AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> (forwarding to the maintainers of other uses)
>
> On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 10:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > There is a defect in krealloc with __GFP_ZERO so this code in
> > drivers/chat/tile-srom.c may not work properly:
> >
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- int devhdl;
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- char buf[20];
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- struct srom_dev *new_srom_devices =
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c: GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- if (!new_srom_devices) {
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- result = -ENOMEM;
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- goto fail_mem;
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- }
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- srom_devices = new_srom_devices;
> >
> > http://linux-kernel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/xyiQV3vf/slab-krealloc-with-gfp-zero-defect
>
> Here are the other in-tree uses that may not work properly
>
> $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "krealloc[^;]+__GFP_ZERO" *
> drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:87: temp_page = krealloc(cap_info->pages,
> pages_needed * sizeof(void *),
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c:375: krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:521: p = krealloc(si->btn, si->si_ofs.btn_keys_size,
> GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:565: p = krealloc(si->xy_mode, si->si_ofs.mode_size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:570: p = krealloc(si->xy_data, si->si_ofs.data_size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:575: p = krealloc(si->btn_rec_data,
> si->si_ofs.btn_rec_size * si->si_ofs.num_btns,
> GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> sound/hda/array.c:28: nlist = krealloc(array->list, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> sound/core/info.c:342: char *nbuf = krealloc(buf->buffer, PAGE_ALIGN(next),
> GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
Isn't this a bug in krealloc()?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 17:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: possible krealloc with __GFP_ZERO defects |
| Message-ID | <s2Pep-PT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1457040 |
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:37 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul, at 11:11:31AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > (forwarding to the maintainers of other uses)
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 10:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >
> > > There is a defect in krealloc with __GFP_ZERO so this code in
> > > drivers/chat/tile-srom.c may not work properly:
> > >
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- int devhdl;
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- char buf[20];
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- struct srom_dev *new_srom_devices =
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c: GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- if (!new_srom_devices) {
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- result = -ENOMEM;
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- goto fail_mem;
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- }
> > > drivers/char/tile-srom.c- srom_devices = new_srom_devices;
> > >
> > > http://linux-kernel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/xyiQV3vf/slab-krealloc-with-gfp-zero-defect
> > Here are the other in-tree uses that may not work properly
> >
> > $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n "krealloc[^;]+__GFP_ZERO" *
> > drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c:87: temp_page = krealloc(cap_info->pages,
> > pages_needed * sizeof(void *),
> > GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > drivers/char/tile-srom.c:375: krealloc(srom_devices, (i+1) * sizeof(struct srom_dev),
> > GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:521: p = krealloc(si->btn, si->si_ofs.btn_keys_size,
> > GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:565: p = krealloc(si->xy_mode, si->si_ofs.mode_size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:570: p = krealloc(si->xy_data, si->si_ofs.data_size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:575: p = krealloc(si->btn_rec_data,
> > si->si_ofs.btn_rec_size * si->si_ofs.num_btns,
> > GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> > sound/hda/array.c:28: nlist = krealloc(array->list, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > sound/core/info.c:342: char *nbuf = krealloc(buf->buffer, PAGE_ALIGN(next),
> > GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> Isn't this a bug in krealloc()?
Yes. Reported 3+ years ago.
http://linux-kernel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/xyiQV3vf/slab-krealloc-with-gfp-zero-defect
This sequence can return non-zeroed memory from the
padding area of the original allocation.
ptr = kzalloc(foo, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ptr)
...
new_ptr = krealloc(ptr, foo + bar, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
If the realloc size is within the first actual allocation
then the additional memory is not zeroed.
If the realloc size is not within the original allocation
size, any non-zeroed padding from the original allocation
is overwriting newly allocated zeroed memory.
Maybe someone more familiar with the alignment & padding can
add the proper memset(,0,) for the __GFP_ZERO cases and also
optimize kmalloc_track_caller to not use __GFP_ZERO, memcpy
the current (non padded) size and zero the newly returned
remainder if necessary.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web