Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1456836 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pma8084 ftsmps and pldo

Started byStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
First post2016-08-05 03:00 +0200
Last post2016-08-05 06:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pma8084  ftsmps and pldo Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-05 03:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pma8084  ftsmps and pldo Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2016-08-05 06:10 +0200

#1456836 — Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pma8084 ftsmps and pldo

FromStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date2016-08-05 03:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pma8084 ftsmps and pldo
Message-ID<s2BEu-qb-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 07/11, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:50:08PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > The voltage ranges listed here are wrong. The pma8084 pldo
> > supports three different overlapping voltage ranges with
> > differing step sizes and the pma8084 ftsmps supports two. These
> > ranges can be seen in the "native" spmi regulator driver
> > (qcom_spmi-regulator.c) at pldo_ranges[] and ftsmps_ranges[]
> > respectively. Port these ranges over to the RPM SMD regulator
> > driver so that we list the appropriate set of supported voltages
> > on these types of regulators.
> > 
> > Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > Fixes: ee01d0c91ef1 ("regulator: qcom-smd: Add support for PMA8084")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >  static const struct regulator_desc pma8084_pldo = {
> >  	.linear_ranges = (struct regulator_linear_range[]) {
> > -		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(750000,  0,  30, 25000),
> > -		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1500000, 31, 99, 50000),
> > +		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE( 750000,  0,  63, 12500),
> 
> It was my understanding that the PMOS ldos only support 25mV and 50mV
> incremements.
> 

Unfortunately that isn't true. It also supports 12.5mV steps for
the lower voltage ranges.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1456869

FromAndy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Date2016-08-05 06:10 +0200
Message-ID<s2ECl-2yr-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1456836
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:57:48PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/11, Andy Gross wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:50:08PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > The voltage ranges listed here are wrong. The pma8084 pldo
> > > supports three different overlapping voltage ranges with
> > > differing step sizes and the pma8084 ftsmps supports two. These
> > > ranges can be seen in the "native" spmi regulator driver
> > > (qcom_spmi-regulator.c) at pldo_ranges[] and ftsmps_ranges[]
> > > respectively. Port these ranges over to the RPM SMD regulator
> > > driver so that we list the appropriate set of supported voltages
> > > on these types of regulators.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > Fixes: ee01d0c91ef1 ("regulator: qcom-smd: Add support for PMA8084")
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > >  static const struct regulator_desc pma8084_pldo = {
> > >  	.linear_ranges = (struct regulator_linear_range[]) {
> > > -		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(750000,  0,  30, 25000),
> > > -		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1500000, 31, 99, 50000),
> > > +		REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE( 750000,  0,  63, 12500),
> > 
> > It was my understanding that the PMOS ldos only support 25mV and 50mV
> > incremements.
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately that isn't true. It also supports 12.5mV steps for
> the lower voltage ranges.

Ok. with that resolved:

Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web