Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1455180 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0252/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH 0252/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 19:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0252/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro "ira.weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com> - 2016-08-03 20:40 +0200

#1455180 — [PATCH 0252/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
index 2d49228..d78e96f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
 static int mad_sendq_size = IB_MAD_QP_SEND_SIZE;
 static int mad_recvq_size = IB_MAD_QP_RECV_SIZE;
 
-module_param_named(send_queue_size, mad_sendq_size, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(send_queue_size, mad_sendq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(send_queue_size, "Size of send queue in number of work requests");
-module_param_named(recv_queue_size, mad_recvq_size, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(recv_queue_size, mad_recvq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(recv_queue_size, "Size of receive queue in number of work requests");
 
 static struct list_head ib_mad_port_list;
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1455953

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:53:28PM +0800, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
> index 2d49228..d78e96f 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
>  static int mad_sendq_size = IB_MAD_QP_SEND_SIZE;
>  static int mad_recvq_size = IB_MAD_QP_RECV_SIZE;
>  
> -module_param_named(send_queue_size, mad_sendq_size, int, 0444);
> +module_param_named(send_queue_size, mad_sendq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(send_queue_size, "Size of send queue in number of work requests");
> -module_param_named(recv_queue_size, mad_recvq_size, int, 0444);
> +module_param_named(recv_queue_size, mad_recvq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(recv_queue_size, "Size of receive queue in number of work requests");
>  
>  static struct list_head ib_mad_port_list;
> -- 
> 2.9.2
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web