Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1453977 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0269/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started byBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
First post2016-08-02 14:10 +0200
Last post2016-08-02 21:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0269/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0269/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-02 21:40 +0200

#1453977 — [PATCH 0269/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date2016-08-02 14:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0269/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1GGe-4fp-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
index 5f58c41..eed3e3c 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
@@ -65,15 +65,15 @@ MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION);
 int ipoib_sendq_size __read_mostly = IPOIB_TX_RING_SIZE;
 int ipoib_recvq_size __read_mostly = IPOIB_RX_RING_SIZE;
 
-module_param_named(send_queue_size, ipoib_sendq_size, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(send_queue_size, ipoib_sendq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(send_queue_size, "Number of descriptors in send queue");
-module_param_named(recv_queue_size, ipoib_recvq_size, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(recv_queue_size, ipoib_recvq_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(recv_queue_size, "Number of descriptors in receive queue");
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPOIB_DEBUG
 int ipoib_debug_level;
 
-module_param_named(debug_level, ipoib_debug_level, int, 0644);
+module_param_named(debug_level, ipoib_debug_level, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug_level, "Enable debug tracing if > 0");
 #endif
 
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1455429

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2016-08-02 21:40 +0200
Message-ID<s1NHH-vc-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1453977
[ removed most the Cc list ]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 08:14:10AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> 
> Hello Baole,
> 
> Please change 0444 into S_IRUGO and 0644 into S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR. The latter
> form is more compact and hence makes the code easier to read.
> 

FYI, Linus already NACKed the entire thread.

-- Steve

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web