Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1455378 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 20:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-02 20:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0047/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 20:40 +0200
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 20:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0047/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Message-ID | <s1MLF-8fV-75@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
index 7188e53..ed76724 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR(DRIVER_AUTHOR);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debugging mode enabled or not");
-module_param(debug, bool, 0644);
+module_param(debug, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("pci_slot");
--
2.9.2
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web